Do shopkeepers have their own moral economy? Profiteering, unfair competition and the black market in Greece, 1916–1945

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nikos Potamianos
{"title":"Do shopkeepers have their own moral economy? Profiteering, unfair competition and the black market in Greece, 1916–1945","authors":"Nikos Potamianos","doi":"10.1080/03071022.2022.2009691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Moral economy has been conceived by E.P. Thompson as being inextricably linked to popular reactions to the emergence of the free market and the government policies promoting it. How useful can the concept be in the study of social groups that form an organic part of the capitalist market and benefit from its expansion – while simultaneously being part of the popular classes? In focusing on the small shopkeeper, can we identify elements of moral economy in their views that are contrary to the logic of the market and the conventional wisdom of liberal political economy? This article offers a thorough examination of the case of Greek shopkeepers between 1916 and 1945. It presents their views regarding issues of profiteering and fair profit; unfair competition and licensed professions; and black markets and the relationship of shopkeepers to the community. The main conclusion is that a broader definition of moral economy than Thompson’s is needed in order to incorporate shopkeepers’ perceptions, freed from the obligatory reference to customary practice and tradition and the element of direct action of the crowd. Therefore, a novel distinction is proposed between a narrow and a broad definition of the moral economy.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03071022.2022.2009691","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Moral economy has been conceived by E.P. Thompson as being inextricably linked to popular reactions to the emergence of the free market and the government policies promoting it. How useful can the concept be in the study of social groups that form an organic part of the capitalist market and benefit from its expansion – while simultaneously being part of the popular classes? In focusing on the small shopkeeper, can we identify elements of moral economy in their views that are contrary to the logic of the market and the conventional wisdom of liberal political economy? This article offers a thorough examination of the case of Greek shopkeepers between 1916 and 1945. It presents their views regarding issues of profiteering and fair profit; unfair competition and licensed professions; and black markets and the relationship of shopkeepers to the community. The main conclusion is that a broader definition of moral economy than Thompson’s is needed in order to incorporate shopkeepers’ perceptions, freed from the obligatory reference to customary practice and tradition and the element of direct action of the crowd. Therefore, a novel distinction is proposed between a narrow and a broad definition of the moral economy.
店主有自己的道德经济吗?1916-1945年,希腊的暴利、不公平竞争和黑市
汤普森认为,道德经济学与公众对自由市场的反应以及政府促进自由市场的政策有着密不可分的联系。这一概念在研究构成资本主义市场有机组成部分并从其扩张中受益的社会群体——同时又是大众阶级的一部分——时能有多大用处?在关注小店主时,我们能否在他们的观点中找出与市场逻辑和自由主义政治经济学的传统智慧相反的道德经济要素?这篇文章对1916年至1945年间希腊店主的案例进行了全面的考察。它提出了他们对暴利和公平利润问题的看法;不正当竞争和持牌行业;黑市和店主与社区的关系。主要结论是,需要一个比汤普森的更广泛的道德经济定义,以纳入店主的看法,摆脱对习惯做法和传统的强制性参考以及人群直接行动的因素。因此,在道德经济的狭义定义和广义定义之间提出了一种新颖的区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信