Features of the constitutional and legal status of the governments of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
О.А. Kozhevnikov, A. Nechkin
{"title":"Features of the constitutional and legal status of the governments of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union","authors":"О.А. Kozhevnikov, A. Nechkin","doi":"10.21638/spbu14.2023.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The consideration of the peculiarities of the constitutional and legal statuses of the governments of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) states (Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan), in the context of the economic integration in the Eurasian post-Soviet space that is increasingly deepening today, is of considerable practical interest. The authors note that the differences in the constitutional and legal statuses of the governments of the EAEU states are primarily due to the peculiarities of the forms of government enshrined in the constitutions of these states, which, for the most part, cannot be classified according to the traditionally distinguished sub-forms of the republican form of government. Despite the debatable nature of the structure of the constitutional and legal status of the government, the authors, taking into account the peculiarities of the forms of government enshrined in the EAEU states, focus on such elements as: constitutional and legal characteristics; composition, procedure for the formation and early termination of powers; competence. Summing up the overall results of the study, the authors come to the conclusion that, despite the presence of common views on economic integration, the EAEU states do not seek unification in terms of the organization of state power on their territory. However, despite this, the general trends towards the possible improvement of the constitutional and legal status of the governments of the majority of the EAEU states can still be identified. These include, first of all, a gradual increase in the degree of independence of governments from the head of state, which, in turn, can be achieved by strengthening the direct interaction of the government with the parliament, as well as by taking into account the opinion of the parliament or its lower house when forming or early termination of the government’s powers.","PeriodicalId":41041,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The consideration of the peculiarities of the constitutional and legal statuses of the governments of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) states (Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan), in the context of the economic integration in the Eurasian post-Soviet space that is increasingly deepening today, is of considerable practical interest. The authors note that the differences in the constitutional and legal statuses of the governments of the EAEU states are primarily due to the peculiarities of the forms of government enshrined in the constitutions of these states, which, for the most part, cannot be classified according to the traditionally distinguished sub-forms of the republican form of government. Despite the debatable nature of the structure of the constitutional and legal status of the government, the authors, taking into account the peculiarities of the forms of government enshrined in the EAEU states, focus on such elements as: constitutional and legal characteristics; composition, procedure for the formation and early termination of powers; competence. Summing up the overall results of the study, the authors come to the conclusion that, despite the presence of common views on economic integration, the EAEU states do not seek unification in terms of the organization of state power on their territory. However, despite this, the general trends towards the possible improvement of the constitutional and legal status of the governments of the majority of the EAEU states can still be identified. These include, first of all, a gradual increase in the degree of independence of governments from the head of state, which, in turn, can be achieved by strengthening the direct interaction of the government with the parliament, as well as by taking into account the opinion of the parliament or its lower house when forming or early termination of the government’s powers.
欧亚经济联盟成员国政府的宪法和法律地位的特点
欧亚经济联盟(EAEU)成员国(俄罗斯、白俄罗斯、哈萨克斯坦、亚美尼亚和吉尔吉斯斯坦)政府在宪法和法律地位方面的特殊性,在欧亚后苏联时代经济一体化日益深化的背景下,具有相当大的现实意义。作者指出,欧亚经济联盟各国政府在宪法和法律地位上的差异主要是由于这些国家宪法中所规定的政府形式的特殊性,在很大程度上,这些政府形式不能按照传统上区分的共和政府形式的子形式进行分类。尽管政府的宪法结构和法律地位存在争议,但考虑到欧亚经济联盟各国政府形式的特殊性,作者将重点放在以下因素上:宪法和法律特征;权力的组成、形成和提前终止的程序;能力。总结研究的总体结果,作者得出的结论是,尽管在经济一体化方面存在共同的观点,但欧亚经济联盟国家在其领土上的国家权力组织方面并不寻求统一。然而,尽管如此,大多数欧亚经济联盟国家政府的宪法和法律地位可能得到改善的总体趋势仍然可以确定。这包括,首先,逐步提高政府独立于国家元首的程度,这反过来又可以通过加强政府与议会的直接互动,以及在形成或提前终止政府权力时考虑议会或其下议院的意见来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信