Ankit Shukla, Senthil Gnanasekaran, Raja Kalayarasan, Biju Pottakkat
{"title":"Early experience with robot-assisted Frey's procedure surgical outcome and technique: Indian perspective.","authors":"Ankit Shukla, Senthil Gnanasekaran, Raja Kalayarasan, Biju Pottakkat","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2022.25.4.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Robotic surgery for pancreatic diseases is currently on the rise, feasible, well-accepted, and safe. Frequently performed procedures in relation to pancreatic diseases include distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy. The literature commonly describes robotic lateral pancreaticojejunostomy; however, data on robot-assisted Frey's is scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We herein, describe our series and technique of robot-assisted Frey's procedure at our tertiary care center between November 2019 and March 2022, and its short-term outcomes in comparison to the open Frey's. Patients with chronic pancreatitis having intractable pain, dilated duct, and no evidence of inflammatory head mass or malignancy were included in the study for robot-assisted Frey's.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study, out of 32 patients, nine patients underwent robot assisted Frey's procedure. The duration of surgery was significantly longer in robotic group (570 minutes vs. 360 minutes, <i>p</i> = 0.003). The medians of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative analgesic requirement were lower in robotic group, but the difference was not statistically significant (250 mL vs. 350 mL, <i>p</i> = 0.400 and 3 days vs. 4 days, <i>p</i> = 0.200, respectively). The median length of hospital stay was shorter in the robotic group, though not significant (6 days vs. 7 days, <i>p</i> = 0.540). At a median follow-up of 28 months, there was no significant difference in the postoperative complications and short-term outcomes between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic surgery offers benefits of laparoscopic surgery in addition it has better visualization, magnification, dexterity, and ergonomics. Frey's procedure is possible robotically with acceptable outcomes in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"25 4","pages":"145-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/b7/jmis-25-4-145.PMC9763489.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2022.25.4.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Purpose: Robotic surgery for pancreatic diseases is currently on the rise, feasible, well-accepted, and safe. Frequently performed procedures in relation to pancreatic diseases include distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy. The literature commonly describes robotic lateral pancreaticojejunostomy; however, data on robot-assisted Frey's is scarce.
Methods: We herein, describe our series and technique of robot-assisted Frey's procedure at our tertiary care center between November 2019 and March 2022, and its short-term outcomes in comparison to the open Frey's. Patients with chronic pancreatitis having intractable pain, dilated duct, and no evidence of inflammatory head mass or malignancy were included in the study for robot-assisted Frey's.
Results: In our study, out of 32 patients, nine patients underwent robot assisted Frey's procedure. The duration of surgery was significantly longer in robotic group (570 minutes vs. 360 minutes, p = 0.003). The medians of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative analgesic requirement were lower in robotic group, but the difference was not statistically significant (250 mL vs. 350 mL, p = 0.400 and 3 days vs. 4 days, p = 0.200, respectively). The median length of hospital stay was shorter in the robotic group, though not significant (6 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.540). At a median follow-up of 28 months, there was no significant difference in the postoperative complications and short-term outcomes between the two groups.
Conclusion: Robotic surgery offers benefits of laparoscopic surgery in addition it has better visualization, magnification, dexterity, and ergonomics. Frey's procedure is possible robotically with acceptable outcomes in selected patients.
目的:胰腺疾病的机器人手术目前呈上升趋势,可行、被广泛接受和安全。与胰腺疾病相关的常用手术包括远端胰腺切除术和胰十二指肠切除术。文献通常描述机器人外侧胰空肠吻合术;然而,关于机器人辅助弗雷氏症的数据很少。方法:本文描述了我们在2019年11月至2022年3月期间在三级护理中心进行的机器人辅助Frey手术的系列和技术,以及与开放式Frey手术相比的短期结果。慢性胰腺炎患者伴有顽固性疼痛,导管扩张,无炎症性头部肿块或恶性肿瘤的证据被纳入机器人辅助Frey的研究中。结果:在我们的研究中,32名患者中,有9名患者接受了机器人辅助的Frey手术。机器人组手术时间明显更长(570分钟vs 360分钟,p = 0.003)。机器人组术中出血量和术后镇痛需求中位数较低,但差异无统计学意义(250 mL vs 350 mL, p = 0.400, 3 d vs 4 d, p = 0.200)。机器人组的中位住院时间较短,但不显著(6天对7天,p = 0.540)。中位随访28个月,两组术后并发症和短期预后无显著差异。结论:机器人手术不仅具有腹腔镜手术的优点,而且具有更好的可视化、放大、灵巧性和人体工程学。Frey的手术在选定的患者中可以通过机器人实现可接受的结果。