Liberal Versus Conservative Fluid Therapy in COVID-19 Patients: What is the Best Strategy for the Treatment of Critically ill Patients?

Jose Bohorquez-Rivero, E. García-Ballestas, Tariq Janjua, L. Moscote-Salazar
{"title":"Liberal Versus Conservative Fluid Therapy in COVID-19 Patients: What is the Best Strategy for the Treatment of Critically ill Patients?","authors":"Jose Bohorquez-Rivero, E. García-Ballestas, Tariq Janjua, L. Moscote-Salazar","doi":"10.4103/jtccm.jtccm_1_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"fluid exudation causing pulmonary edema; this, in turn, leads to alveolar gas exchange disorders.[13] In this way, due to pulmonary edema in critical COVID‐19 patients, excessive fluid therapy and a positive fluid balance in COVID‐19 patients too could increase extravascular lung water due to pulmonary capillary leak and this affecting gas exchange, resulting in a worse prognosis;[14] therefore, according to this and in view of the benefit observed in other ARDS or sepsis populations, the consequences of a positive fluid balance, the possible reduction in the cost of administering less fluids, and the feasibility of the intervention, it has been suggested to use a conservative strategy over a liberal fluid therapy in critical patients with COVID‐19. This conservative approach could reduce the occurrence of a positive fluid balance while ensuring tissue perfusion.[7,9,14]","PeriodicalId":93326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Translational Critical Care Medicine","volume":"61 1","pages":"1 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Translational Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jtccm.jtccm_1_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

fluid exudation causing pulmonary edema; this, in turn, leads to alveolar gas exchange disorders.[13] In this way, due to pulmonary edema in critical COVID‐19 patients, excessive fluid therapy and a positive fluid balance in COVID‐19 patients too could increase extravascular lung water due to pulmonary capillary leak and this affecting gas exchange, resulting in a worse prognosis;[14] therefore, according to this and in view of the benefit observed in other ARDS or sepsis populations, the consequences of a positive fluid balance, the possible reduction in the cost of administering less fluids, and the feasibility of the intervention, it has been suggested to use a conservative strategy over a liberal fluid therapy in critical patients with COVID‐19. This conservative approach could reduce the occurrence of a positive fluid balance while ensuring tissue perfusion.[7,9,14]
COVID-19患者的自由与保守液体治疗:治疗危重患者的最佳策略是什么?
引起肺水肿的液体渗出;这反过来又导致肺泡气体交换紊乱。[13]这样,由于COVID - 19危重患者的肺水肿,过度的液体治疗和COVID - 19患者的正液体平衡也可能由于肺毛细血管泄漏而增加血管外肺水,这影响了气体交换,导致预后更差。[14]因此,根据这一点,并考虑到在其他ARDS或败血症人群中观察到的益处,正液体平衡的后果,可能会降低给予较少液体的成本,鉴于干预措施的可行性,建议在COVID - 19危重患者中使用保守策略而不是自由液体治疗。这种保守方法可以在保证组织灌注的同时减少体液正平衡的发生[7,9,14]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信