Immediate Implant Combined With Modified Socket-Shield Technique: A Case Letter.

Hong Huang, Linjing Shu, Yunfei Liu, Li Wang, Jiao Li, G. Fu
{"title":"Immediate Implant Combined With Modified Socket-Shield Technique: A Case Letter.","authors":"Hong Huang, Linjing Shu, Yunfei Liu, Li Wang, Jiao Li, G. Fu","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I t had been clearly shown in both animal and clinical studies that the alveolar ridge remodeling took place soon after tooth extraction, which would particularly affect the shape of buccal lamella. The major drawback on implant-based rehabilitation was bone resorption. Several studies had suggested that osseointegration might be achieved through immediate implant placement, but this method could cause multiple biological responses in the extraction socket. The guided bone regeneration (GBR) was another widely used technique to preserve the alveolar ridge. However, the bone graft placed between the implants and labial bony plate may not compensate the buccal bundle bone loss. The question remains on how to prevent the bone loss during tooth implantation. Therefore, it is eager to demand desirable solution. After tooth extraction, the remarkable alterations in the buccal bone plate were caused by periodontal ligament loss and the consecutive trauma. Intriguingly, it seemed bone resorption could be prevented by root retention. Hürzeler et al evaluated effects of retaining the buccal portion of the root in conjunction with immediate implant placement. Their results demonstrated that this technique could restrain the buccal bone resorption to a large degree. It also achieved significantly higher implant success rates compared with longitudinal data on immediate implant placement after complete root extraction. In previous reports, only 1 root fragment exhibited signs of resorption, at the same time, the implant remained functional. Notably, when implants were placed lingual to the tooth fragment, connective tissues could be observed in the gaps, which would affect implants and the coronal root fragments. On the other hand, placing implants in direct contact with tooth fragments could increase risk of displacing buccal root fragments or missing the buccal lamellar bone. Even with those concerns, it was evident that the socket-shield technique could maintain the healthy periodontium, gingival tissues, and original crestal bone height and contour. To further improve this method and reduce adverse effects, we attempted to keep the gaps and fill them with bone graft materials to minimize root resorption. This case report was targeted to evaluate the feasibility of this modified approach in a clinical practice setting.","PeriodicalId":77634,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral implantology : implantologist","volume":"45 1","pages":"139-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral implantology : implantologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

I t had been clearly shown in both animal and clinical studies that the alveolar ridge remodeling took place soon after tooth extraction, which would particularly affect the shape of buccal lamella. The major drawback on implant-based rehabilitation was bone resorption. Several studies had suggested that osseointegration might be achieved through immediate implant placement, but this method could cause multiple biological responses in the extraction socket. The guided bone regeneration (GBR) was another widely used technique to preserve the alveolar ridge. However, the bone graft placed between the implants and labial bony plate may not compensate the buccal bundle bone loss. The question remains on how to prevent the bone loss during tooth implantation. Therefore, it is eager to demand desirable solution. After tooth extraction, the remarkable alterations in the buccal bone plate were caused by periodontal ligament loss and the consecutive trauma. Intriguingly, it seemed bone resorption could be prevented by root retention. Hürzeler et al evaluated effects of retaining the buccal portion of the root in conjunction with immediate implant placement. Their results demonstrated that this technique could restrain the buccal bone resorption to a large degree. It also achieved significantly higher implant success rates compared with longitudinal data on immediate implant placement after complete root extraction. In previous reports, only 1 root fragment exhibited signs of resorption, at the same time, the implant remained functional. Notably, when implants were placed lingual to the tooth fragment, connective tissues could be observed in the gaps, which would affect implants and the coronal root fragments. On the other hand, placing implants in direct contact with tooth fragments could increase risk of displacing buccal root fragments or missing the buccal lamellar bone. Even with those concerns, it was evident that the socket-shield technique could maintain the healthy periodontium, gingival tissues, and original crestal bone height and contour. To further improve this method and reduce adverse effects, we attempted to keep the gaps and fill them with bone graft materials to minimize root resorption. This case report was targeted to evaluate the feasibility of this modified approach in a clinical practice setting.
即刻种植结合改良的套管-屏蔽技术:一个案例。
动物和临床研究都清楚地表明,牙槽嵴重塑发生在拔牙后不久,尤其会影响颊板的形状。种植体康复的主要缺点是骨吸收。一些研究表明,通过立即植入种植体可以实现骨整合,但这种方法可能在拔牙槽中引起多种生物反应。引导骨再生(GBR)是保存牙槽嵴的另一种广泛应用的技术。然而,植骨体与唇骨板之间的骨移植不能弥补颊束骨的损失。在植牙过程中如何防止骨质流失仍是一个问题。因此,迫切需要理想的解决方案。拔牙后,由于牙周韧带缺失和连续外伤,导致颊骨板发生明显改变。有趣的是,似乎可以通过牙根保留来阻止骨吸收。h rzeler等人评估了保留根的颊部与即刻种植体放置的效果。结果表明,该技术可以在很大程度上抑制口腔骨吸收。与纵向数据相比,在完全拔根后立即放置种植体的种植成功率也显着提高。在以往的报道中,只有1根碎片表现出吸收的迹象,同时种植体保持功能。值得注意的是,当种植体放置在牙片的舌侧时,在间隙中可以观察到结缔组织,这将影响种植体和冠状根碎片。另一方面,种植体与牙片直接接触会增加牙根碎片移位或缺失牙板骨的风险。尽管存在这些担忧,但很明显,牙槽屏蔽技术可以保持健康的牙周组织、牙龈组织和原有的牙冠骨高度和轮廓。为了进一步改进该方法并减少不良反应,我们尝试保留间隙并用骨移植材料填充以减少根吸收。本病例报告旨在评估这种改良方法在临床实践中的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书