Estimating the treatment effect with propensity score when the effect varies by patient characteristics: A case study and simulation

Q4 Mathematics
D. Kabata, A. Shintani
{"title":"Estimating the treatment effect with propensity score when the effect varies by patient characteristics: A case study and simulation","authors":"D. Kabata, A. Shintani","doi":"10.1080/23737484.2022.2043201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The different propensity score estimators reflect the average effect on the different populations. Particularly, it is pointed out that different causal inference methods based on propensity scores lead to entirely different conclusions when the treatment effect is not uniform across the study population. However, many clinical studies did not care about the difference in the estimands. To illustrate the difference in the estimated values depending on the propensity score methods in practice, were-analyzed a case study assessing the effects of surgical treatment among tongue cancer patients, which the treatment effect varied depending on the patients’ characteristics. Then we conducted a computer simulation to verify the results of the case study.","PeriodicalId":36561,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Statistics Case Studies Data Analysis and Applications","volume":"1 1","pages":"368 - 380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Statistics Case Studies Data Analysis and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23737484.2022.2043201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The different propensity score estimators reflect the average effect on the different populations. Particularly, it is pointed out that different causal inference methods based on propensity scores lead to entirely different conclusions when the treatment effect is not uniform across the study population. However, many clinical studies did not care about the difference in the estimands. To illustrate the difference in the estimated values depending on the propensity score methods in practice, were-analyzed a case study assessing the effects of surgical treatment among tongue cancer patients, which the treatment effect varied depending on the patients’ characteristics. Then we conducted a computer simulation to verify the results of the case study.
当效果随患者特征变化时,用倾向评分估计治疗效果:一个案例研究和模拟
不同的倾向得分估计反映了对不同群体的平均效应。特别指出的是,当治疗效果在整个研究人群中不均匀时,基于倾向得分的不同因果推断方法会导致完全不同的结论。然而,许多临床研究并不关心估计的差异。为了说明倾向评分方法在实际应用中对舌癌患者的估计值存在差异,我们分析了舌癌患者手术治疗效果评估的案例研究,其中舌癌患者的手术治疗效果因患者的特点而异。然后,我们进行了计算机模拟来验证案例研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信