Abortion Is Healthcare: Lessons From a Public Hospital

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Dissent Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/dss.2023.0027
Amy Zanoni
{"title":"Abortion Is Healthcare: Lessons From a Public Hospital","authors":"Amy Zanoni","doi":"10.1353/dss.2023.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"F E M IN IS M A F t E R D O B B S Since the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, many have invoked the coat hanger and the public hospital septic abortion ward as portents of life after the fall of Roe. Illinois Governor J. B. Pritzker was one of many pro-choice advocates who made direct reference to Ward 41 at Chicago’s public hospital, Cook County Hospital. But by only paying attention to the horror stories of botched abortions in the pre-Roe era, we miss the other lessons that public hospitals like Cook County can teach us: even during Roe, access to abortion was limited, hard-fought, and dependent on local conditions. Public hospitals are key to understanding the brutal consequences of policies that limit people’s access to healthcare, as well as the role that local governments often play in a country with no national healthcare system. In providing care to everyone who came through its doors, the public hospital approximated the right to healthcare. When county, state, and federal lawmakers undermined the right to reproductive care, Chicagoans demanded its reinstatement at Cook County Hospital. these struggles and the hospital’s history shed light on the importance of tethering demands for reproductive rights to a more expansive welfare state and healthcare system. they also help us understand the crucial importance of federal action.","PeriodicalId":51822,"journal":{"name":"Dissent","volume":"22 1","pages":"33 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dissent","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dss.2023.0027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

F E M IN IS M A F t E R D O B B S Since the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, many have invoked the coat hanger and the public hospital septic abortion ward as portents of life after the fall of Roe. Illinois Governor J. B. Pritzker was one of many pro-choice advocates who made direct reference to Ward 41 at Chicago’s public hospital, Cook County Hospital. But by only paying attention to the horror stories of botched abortions in the pre-Roe era, we miss the other lessons that public hospitals like Cook County can teach us: even during Roe, access to abortion was limited, hard-fought, and dependent on local conditions. Public hospitals are key to understanding the brutal consequences of policies that limit people’s access to healthcare, as well as the role that local governments often play in a country with no national healthcare system. In providing care to everyone who came through its doors, the public hospital approximated the right to healthcare. When county, state, and federal lawmakers undermined the right to reproductive care, Chicagoans demanded its reinstatement at Cook County Hospital. these struggles and the hospital’s history shed light on the importance of tethering demands for reproductive rights to a more expansive welfare state and healthcare system. they also help us understand the crucial importance of federal action.
堕胎是医疗保健:公立医院的经验教训
自从最高法院对多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案作出判决以来,许多人把衣架和公立医院的败血性流产病房作为罗伊案败诉后生活的预兆。伊利诺伊州州长j·b·普利兹克是众多支持堕胎的倡导者之一,他直接提到了芝加哥公立医院库克县医院的第41号病房。但是,如果只关注罗伊案之前糟糕的堕胎故事,我们就错过了库克县等公立医院可以教给我们的其他教训:即使在罗伊案期间,堕胎的机会也是有限的、艰难的,而且取决于当地的情况。公立医院是了解限制人们获得医疗服务的政策的残酷后果的关键,也是了解地方政府在一个没有国家医疗体系的国家经常扮演的角色的关键。公立医院向每一位前来就诊的人提供医疗服务,这接近于享有医疗保健的权利。当县、州和联邦立法者破坏生殖保健的权利时,芝加哥人要求在库克县医院恢复生殖保健。这些斗争和这家医院的历史,让我们明白了将生育权利的要求与一个更广泛的福利国家和医疗体系联系起来的重要性。它们还帮助我们理解联邦行动的至关重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dissent
Dissent Multiple-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信