{"title":"Understanding the Evolution of “Khaki Capital” in Thailand: A Historical Institutionalist Perspective","authors":"P. Chambers","doi":"10.1355/cs43-3c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Using the framework of Historical Institutionalism, this article examines the evolution of “khaki capital”, or the economic power of military forces, in Thailand, and how the history of Thai khaki capital has been shaped by the contours of Thai civil-military relations. The article argues that the military’s financial autonomy and economic power constrain the ability of civilians to control it. A combination of related factors—including Thailand’s legacies of authoritarianism, the monarchy’s support for the military, the armed forces’ ability to maintain its relative cohesion (while civilians remain divided), continuing national emergencies and the use of coups to impede civilian rule—has established a “lock-in” of authoritarian path dependence in Thailand. This, in turn, has allowed the military to maintain its influence over the national economy through the defence budget, land, corporate ownership and shareholdings as well as corporate sinecures.","PeriodicalId":46227,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Southeast Asia","volume":"307 1","pages":"496 - 530"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Southeast Asia","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1355/cs43-3c","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Abstract:Using the framework of Historical Institutionalism, this article examines the evolution of “khaki capital”, or the economic power of military forces, in Thailand, and how the history of Thai khaki capital has been shaped by the contours of Thai civil-military relations. The article argues that the military’s financial autonomy and economic power constrain the ability of civilians to control it. A combination of related factors—including Thailand’s legacies of authoritarianism, the monarchy’s support for the military, the armed forces’ ability to maintain its relative cohesion (while civilians remain divided), continuing national emergencies and the use of coups to impede civilian rule—has established a “lock-in” of authoritarian path dependence in Thailand. This, in turn, has allowed the military to maintain its influence over the national economy through the defence budget, land, corporate ownership and shareholdings as well as corporate sinecures.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Southeast Asia (CSEA) is one of the ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute''s flagship publications. Now in its fourth decade of publication, CSEA has succeeded in building up an international reputation as one of Southeast Asia''s premier academic journals. The aim of the peer reviewed journal is to provide subscribers with up to date and in-depth analysis of critical trends and developments in Southeast Asia and the wider Asia-Pacific region. The primary focus of the journal is on issues related to domestic politics in Southeast Asian countries, regional architecture and community building, military, strategic and security affairs, conflict zones and relations among the Great Powers. CSEA publishes authoritative, insightful and original contributions from scholars, think-tank analysts, journalists and policy-makers from across the globe. The Editorial Committee is guided by the advice of the International Advisory Committee which is composed of eminent scholars from Asia, the United States, Australia and Europe.