Use of Wideband Acoustic Immittance in Neonates and Infants.

Q2 Health Professions
Hammam AlMakadma, Sreedevi Aithal, Venkatesh Aithal, Joseph Kei
{"title":"Use of Wideband Acoustic Immittance in Neonates and Infants.","authors":"Hammam AlMakadma,&nbsp;Sreedevi Aithal,&nbsp;Venkatesh Aithal,&nbsp;Joseph Kei","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1764200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With widespread agreement on the importance of early identification of hearing loss, universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) has become the standard of care in several countries. Despite advancements in screening technology, UNHS and early hearing detection and intervention programs continue to be burdened by high referral rates of false-positive cases due to temporary obstruction of sound in the outer/middle ear at birth. A sensitive adjunct test of middle ear at the time of screening would aid in the interpretation of screening outcomes, minimize unnecessary rescreens, and prioritize referral to diagnostic assessment for infants with permanent congenital hearing loss. Determination of middle ear status is also an important aspect of diagnostic assessment in infants. Standard single-frequency tympanometry used to determine middle ear status in infants is neither efficient nor accurate in newborns and young infants. A growing body of research has demonstrated the utility of wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) testing in both screening and diagnostic settings. Wideband power absorbance (WBA), a WAI measure, has been shown to be more sensitive than tympanometry in the assessment of outer/middle ear function in newborns. Furthermore, age-graded norms also support successful application of WBA in young infants. Despite its merits, uptake of this technology is low among pediatric audiologists and hearing screening health workers. This report describes normative data, methods for assessment and interpretation of WBA, test-retest variations, and other factors pertinent to clinical use of WAI in newborns and infants. Clinical cases illustrate the use of WAI testing in newborn and infant hearing assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":53691,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Hearing","volume":"44 1","pages":"29-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014211/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With widespread agreement on the importance of early identification of hearing loss, universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) has become the standard of care in several countries. Despite advancements in screening technology, UNHS and early hearing detection and intervention programs continue to be burdened by high referral rates of false-positive cases due to temporary obstruction of sound in the outer/middle ear at birth. A sensitive adjunct test of middle ear at the time of screening would aid in the interpretation of screening outcomes, minimize unnecessary rescreens, and prioritize referral to diagnostic assessment for infants with permanent congenital hearing loss. Determination of middle ear status is also an important aspect of diagnostic assessment in infants. Standard single-frequency tympanometry used to determine middle ear status in infants is neither efficient nor accurate in newborns and young infants. A growing body of research has demonstrated the utility of wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) testing in both screening and diagnostic settings. Wideband power absorbance (WBA), a WAI measure, has been shown to be more sensitive than tympanometry in the assessment of outer/middle ear function in newborns. Furthermore, age-graded norms also support successful application of WBA in young infants. Despite its merits, uptake of this technology is low among pediatric audiologists and hearing screening health workers. This report describes normative data, methods for assessment and interpretation of WBA, test-retest variations, and other factors pertinent to clinical use of WAI in newborns and infants. Clinical cases illustrate the use of WAI testing in newborn and infant hearing assessment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

宽带声阻抗在新生儿和婴儿中的应用。
由于人们普遍认识到早期发现听力损失的重要性,新生儿普遍听力筛查(UNHS)已成为一些国家的护理标准。尽管筛查技术取得了进步,但由于出生时外耳/中耳暂时受阻而导致的假阳性病例转诊率很高,卫生保健和早期听力检测和干预项目仍然负担沉重。在筛查时对中耳进行敏感的辅助测试将有助于解释筛查结果,减少不必要的筛查,并优先考虑永久性先天性听力损失婴儿的诊断评估。确定中耳状态也是婴儿诊断评估的一个重要方面。用于确定婴儿中耳状态的标准单频鼓室测量法在新生儿和幼儿中既不有效也不准确。越来越多的研究表明,宽带声阻抗(WAI)测试在筛查和诊断环境中的实用性。宽带功率吸收(WBA)是一种WAI测量方法,在评估新生儿外耳/中耳功能方面比鼓室测量法更敏感。此外,年龄分级规范也支持在幼儿中成功应用WBA。尽管有其优点,但这项技术在儿科听力学家和听力筛查卫生工作者中的使用率很低。本报告描述了规范数据、评估和解释WBA的方法、测试-再测试差异以及与新生儿和婴儿WAI临床应用相关的其他因素。临床病例说明WAI测试在新生儿和婴儿听力评估中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Hearing
Seminars in Hearing Health Professions-Speech and Hearing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Seminars in Hearing is a quarterly review journal that publishes topic-specific issues in the field of audiology including areas such as hearing loss, auditory disorders and psychoacoustics. The journal presents the latest clinical data, new screening and assessment techniques, along with suggestions for improving patient care in a concise and readable forum. Technological advances with regards to new auditory devices are also featured. The journal"s content is an ideal reference for both the practicing audiologist as well as an excellent educational tool for students who require the latest information on emerging techniques and areas of interest in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书