Factors affecting vaccine uptake rate: the story of measles, mumps and rubella

Q3 Medicine
Tina Downey, J. Moore, B. Millar
{"title":"Factors affecting vaccine uptake rate: the story of measles, mumps and rubella","authors":"Tina Downey, J. Moore, B. Millar","doi":"10.1097/MRM.0000000000000274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccine uptake can greatly impact on the ability of a country or region to eliminate a disease, which could be detrimental to society if allowed free reign. A high vaccine coverage can produce herd immunity, which confers protection upon the unvaccinated individuals within the population. Although some countries take a voluntary approach to vaccination policies, other countries have mandatory vaccination for specific pathogens. There is a clear inverse correlation between vaccine uptake and incidence of disease and in many countries a trivalent vaccine against measles, mumps and rubella is included in the vaccination schedule. Although naturally acquired immunity is gained from infection by the circulating wild-type virus, the live attenuated vaccine has an effect which wanes over a period of time. In recent years, there has been a global spike in the incidence of both measles and mumps and some authorities are using a third dose of the vaccine to inhibit the spread of any outbreaks which occur. Many factors, such as concerns over vaccine safety and susceptibility to disease have had an impact on vaccine uptake and media bias and misinformation have played a role. With the occurrence of a global pandemic of COVID-19 beginning in late 2019 and continuing for the duration of 2020, access to healthcare and routine vaccination have been affected and vaccine programmes interrupted because of the need for social distancing measures. This may have an impact on future generations, as a significant decline can reduce herd immunity, allowing diseases, which had obtained elimination status to re-emerge.","PeriodicalId":49625,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Medical Microbiology","volume":"33 1","pages":"158 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRM.0000000000000274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vaccine uptake can greatly impact on the ability of a country or region to eliminate a disease, which could be detrimental to society if allowed free reign. A high vaccine coverage can produce herd immunity, which confers protection upon the unvaccinated individuals within the population. Although some countries take a voluntary approach to vaccination policies, other countries have mandatory vaccination for specific pathogens. There is a clear inverse correlation between vaccine uptake and incidence of disease and in many countries a trivalent vaccine against measles, mumps and rubella is included in the vaccination schedule. Although naturally acquired immunity is gained from infection by the circulating wild-type virus, the live attenuated vaccine has an effect which wanes over a period of time. In recent years, there has been a global spike in the incidence of both measles and mumps and some authorities are using a third dose of the vaccine to inhibit the spread of any outbreaks which occur. Many factors, such as concerns over vaccine safety and susceptibility to disease have had an impact on vaccine uptake and media bias and misinformation have played a role. With the occurrence of a global pandemic of COVID-19 beginning in late 2019 and continuing for the duration of 2020, access to healthcare and routine vaccination have been affected and vaccine programmes interrupted because of the need for social distancing measures. This may have an impact on future generations, as a significant decline can reduce herd immunity, allowing diseases, which had obtained elimination status to re-emerge.
影响疫苗接种率的因素:麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹的故事
接种疫苗可极大地影响一个国家或区域消灭某种疾病的能力,如果放任自由,可能对社会有害。高疫苗覆盖率可产生群体免疫,从而保护人群中未接种疫苗的个人。虽然一些国家对疫苗接种政策采取自愿做法,但其他国家对特定病原体实行强制性疫苗接种。接种疫苗与疾病发病率之间存在明显的负相关关系,在许多国家,针对麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹的三价疫苗被列入疫苗接种计划。虽然通过感染流行的野生型病毒可获得自然获得性免疫,但减毒活疫苗的效果会在一段时间后减弱。近年来,麻疹和腮腺炎的全球发病率都出现了激增,一些当局正在使用第三剂疫苗来抑制任何暴发的传播。许多因素,如对疫苗安全性和疾病易感性的担忧,对疫苗的吸收产生了影响,媒体偏见和错误信息也发挥了作用。随着2019年底开始并持续到2020年的2019冠状病毒病全球大流行的发生,由于需要采取社会距离措施,获得医疗保健和常规疫苗接种受到影响,疫苗规划中断。这可能会对子孙后代产生影响,因为大幅下降可能会降低群体免疫力,使已获得消灭地位的疾病重新出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in Medical Microbiology
Reviews in Medical Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Medical Microbiology is a quarterly review journal which provides a balanced coverage of the whole field of medical microbiology. The Journal publishes state-of-the art reviews, mini-reviews, case presentations and original research from on-going research of the latest developments and techniques in medical microbiology, virology, mycology, parasitology, clinical microbiology, and hospital infection.​ In addition, PhD-Review - a platform for young researchers, and biographical Bio-Sketch articles are also considered. Reviews are concise, authoritative, and readable synthesis of the latest information on its subject, and references are limited to the fifty key sources for full reviews and twenty for mini-reviews. Reviews in Medical Microbiology is the perfect way for both qualified and trainee microbiologists, and researchers and clinicians with an interest in microbiology, to stay fully informed of the latest developments in medical microbiology. The journal is a valuable resource for educational and teaching purposes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信