{"title":"10. Derivative claims","authors":"A. Dignam, J. Lowry","doi":"10.1093/HE/9780198811831.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Titles in the Core Text series take the reader straight to the heart of the subject, providing focused, concise, and reliable guides for students at all levels. This chapter examines derivative action as a means of safeguarding minority shareholders against abuses of power and its implications for the principle of majority rule. It begins by analysing the rule in Foss v Harbottle (1843), which translates the doctrine of separate legal personality, the statutory contract, the ‘internal management principle’, and the principle of majority rule into a rule of procedure governing locus standi (that is, who has standing to sue), as well as the exceptions to that rule. It then considers various types of shareholder actions, including personal claims, representative actions (group litigation), and derivative claims. It also discusses derivative claims under the Companies Act 2006, with emphasis on the two-stage process of the application for permission to continue a derivative claim. The chapter concludes by assessing bars to a derivative action, together with liability insurance and qualifying third party indemnity provisions.","PeriodicalId":10779,"journal":{"name":"Company Law","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Company Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/HE/9780198811831.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Titles in the Core Text series take the reader straight to the heart of the subject, providing focused, concise, and reliable guides for students at all levels. This chapter examines derivative action as a means of safeguarding minority shareholders against abuses of power and its implications for the principle of majority rule. It begins by analysing the rule in Foss v Harbottle (1843), which translates the doctrine of separate legal personality, the statutory contract, the ‘internal management principle’, and the principle of majority rule into a rule of procedure governing locus standi (that is, who has standing to sue), as well as the exceptions to that rule. It then considers various types of shareholder actions, including personal claims, representative actions (group litigation), and derivative claims. It also discusses derivative claims under the Companies Act 2006, with emphasis on the two-stage process of the application for permission to continue a derivative claim. The chapter concludes by assessing bars to a derivative action, together with liability insurance and qualifying third party indemnity provisions.
核心文本系列的标题将读者直接带到主题的核心,为各个层次的学生提供集中,简洁和可靠的指南。本章探讨了派生诉讼作为保护少数股东不受权力滥用的一种手段及其对多数决原则的影响。本文首先分析Foss v Harbottle(1843)一案的规则,该规则将独立法人人格原则、法定合同、“内部管理原则”和多数决定原则转化为管辖立场(即谁有起诉资格)的程序规则,以及该规则的例外情况。然后考虑各种类型的股东诉讼,包括个人索赔,代表诉讼(团体诉讼)和衍生索赔。本文还讨论了《2006年公司法》下的衍生索赔,重点介绍了继续衍生索赔许可申请的两阶段过程。本章最后评估了衍生诉讼的障碍,以及责任保险和合格的第三方赔偿规定。