Sunitinib Versus Pazopanib as Initial Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma of Intermediate and Poor-Risk Characteristics: Real-World, a Single-Center

Hayriye Şahinli, Esra Zeynelgil, O. Dogan, D. Yazılıtaş
{"title":"Sunitinib Versus Pazopanib as Initial Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma of Intermediate and Poor-Risk Characteristics: Real-World, a Single-Center","authors":"Hayriye Şahinli, Esra Zeynelgil, O. Dogan, D. Yazılıtaş","doi":"10.11648/j.jctr.20231101.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background : Sunitinib and pazopanib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In this study, our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of sunitinib or pazopanib in patients with intermediate or poor risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Methods : A total of 60 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma were retrospectively evaluated between January 2014 and December 2020. Survival analyzes were performed with the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Results : Forty-six (76.7%) patients were male. Of the patients who received sunitinib, 22 patients (57.9%) were in the intermediate risk group, while 16 patients (42.1%) were in the poor risk group. Among patients receiving pazopanib, 14 patients (63.6%) were in the intermediate-risk group, while 8 patients (36.4%) were in the poor-risk group. There were no significant difference in the intermediate risk group of patients in terms of median progression-free survival between sunitinib and pazopanib (p=0.742). No significant differences were found in terms of progression-free survival in the high-risk group of patients (p=0.254). There were no significant differences in overall survival in the intermediate-risk group of patients receiving sunitinib or pazopanib (p = 0.377). There were no significant differences in terms of overall survival in the high-risk patient group receiving sunitinib or pazopanib (p = 0.3777). Conclusions: There were no significant difference in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival between the intermediate and poor-risk patient groups receiving pazopanib or sunitinib.","PeriodicalId":93775,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer treatment and research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer treatment and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20231101.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Background : Sunitinib and pazopanib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In this study, our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of sunitinib or pazopanib in patients with intermediate or poor risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Methods : A total of 60 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma were retrospectively evaluated between January 2014 and December 2020. Survival analyzes were performed with the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Results : Forty-six (76.7%) patients were male. Of the patients who received sunitinib, 22 patients (57.9%) were in the intermediate risk group, while 16 patients (42.1%) were in the poor risk group. Among patients receiving pazopanib, 14 patients (63.6%) were in the intermediate-risk group, while 8 patients (36.4%) were in the poor-risk group. There were no significant difference in the intermediate risk group of patients in terms of median progression-free survival between sunitinib and pazopanib (p=0.742). No significant differences were found in terms of progression-free survival in the high-risk group of patients (p=0.254). There were no significant differences in overall survival in the intermediate-risk group of patients receiving sunitinib or pazopanib (p = 0.377). There were no significant differences in terms of overall survival in the high-risk patient group receiving sunitinib or pazopanib (p = 0.3777). Conclusions: There were no significant difference in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival between the intermediate and poor-risk patient groups receiving pazopanib or sunitinib.
舒尼替尼与帕唑帕尼作为转移性肾细胞癌中、低危险特征的初始治疗:真实世界,单中心研究
背景:舒尼替尼和帕唑帕尼是酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs),用于转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的一线治疗。在这项研究中,我们的目的是评估舒尼替尼或帕唑帕尼在中度或低风险转移性肾细胞癌患者中的有效性。方法:回顾性分析2014年1月至2020年12月60例转移性肾细胞癌患者。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier检验和log-rank检验。结果:男性46例(76.7%)。在接受舒尼替尼治疗的患者中,22例患者(57.9%)处于中度危险组,16例患者(42.1%)处于低危险组。在接受帕唑帕尼治疗的患者中,14例患者(63.6%)处于中危组,8例患者(36.4%)处于低危组。中危组患者舒尼替尼和帕唑帕尼的中位无进展生存期差异无统计学意义(p=0.742)。高危组患者的无进展生存期无显著差异(p=0.254)。接受舒尼替尼或帕唑帕尼的中危组患者的总生存率无显著差异(p = 0.377)。高危患者组接受舒尼替尼或帕唑帕尼的总生存率无显著差异(p = 0.3777)。结论:接受帕唑帕尼或舒尼替尼治疗的中低危患者组在无进展生存期和总生存期方面无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信