Building a High-Quality Assessment and Accountability Program: The Philadelphia Example

Andrew Porter, A. Chester
{"title":"Building a High-Quality Assessment and Accountability Program: The Philadelphia Example","authors":"Andrew Porter, A. Chester","doi":"10.1353/PEP.2002.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of implementing an assessment and accountability program in an urban school district is to improve student learning of worthwhile content.1 Current levels of achievement in most U.S. urban districts are unacceptably low. Average achievement test results conceal the fact that achievement levels of students of color are substantially lower than those of white students. Improvements are urgently needed. Assessment and accountability, by themselves, are unlikely to turn around the low levels of student achievement in urban settings.2 Supports must be put in place so that students and schools can be successful. Such supports must be an integral part of an effective assessment and accountability program. Nevertheless, high-stakes testing can be a powerful policy lever in a more comprehensive reform initiative.3 Some education researchers and practitioners believe that high-stakes testing leads to a dumbed-down curriculum and unfair penalties for students and schools.4 Others believe equally strongly that, without high-stakes testing, many schools will continue to provide inadequate opportunities to learn for students, especially students from low-income families. We believe that a","PeriodicalId":9272,"journal":{"name":"Brookings Papers on Education Policy","volume":"55 1","pages":"285 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brookings Papers on Education Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/PEP.2002.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

The purpose of implementing an assessment and accountability program in an urban school district is to improve student learning of worthwhile content.1 Current levels of achievement in most U.S. urban districts are unacceptably low. Average achievement test results conceal the fact that achievement levels of students of color are substantially lower than those of white students. Improvements are urgently needed. Assessment and accountability, by themselves, are unlikely to turn around the low levels of student achievement in urban settings.2 Supports must be put in place so that students and schools can be successful. Such supports must be an integral part of an effective assessment and accountability program. Nevertheless, high-stakes testing can be a powerful policy lever in a more comprehensive reform initiative.3 Some education researchers and practitioners believe that high-stakes testing leads to a dumbed-down curriculum and unfair penalties for students and schools.4 Others believe equally strongly that, without high-stakes testing, many schools will continue to provide inadequate opportunities to learn for students, especially students from low-income families. We believe that a
建立一个高质量的评估和问责计划:费城的例子
在城市学区实施评估和问责制计划的目的是提高学生对有价值内容的学习美国大多数城市地区目前的教育成就水平低得令人无法接受。平均成绩测试结果掩盖了一个事实,即有色人种学生的成绩水平远低于白人学生。迫切需要改进。评价和问责制本身不太可能扭转城市环境中学生成绩低下的局面支持必须到位,这样学生和学校才能取得成功。这种支持必须是有效的评估和问责方案的一个组成部分。然而,高风险测试在更全面的改革举措中可以成为一个强有力的政策杠杆一些教育研究者和实践者认为,高风险的考试会导致课程的简单化,对学生和学校的惩罚也不公平另一些人同样强烈地认为,如果没有高风险的考试,许多学校将继续为学生提供不足的学习机会,尤其是来自低收入家庭的学生。我们相信
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信