Integration testing and metamorphic testing

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Yves Le Traon, Tao Xie
{"title":"Integration testing and metamorphic testing","authors":"Yves Le Traon, Tao Xie","doi":"10.1002/stvr.1817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first paper, ‘ Towards using coupling measures to guide black-box integration testing in component-based systems ’ concerns integration testing in component-based systems. The authors investigate the correlation between component and interface coupling measures found in literature and the number of observed failures at two architectural levels: the component level and the software interface level. The finding serves as a first step towards an approach for systematic selection of test cases during integration testing of a distributed component-based software system with black-box components. For example, the number of coupled elements may be an indicator for failure-proneness and can be used to guide test case prioritisation during system integration testing; data-flow-based coupling measurements may not capture the nature of an automotive software system and thus are inapplicable; having a grey box model may improve system integration testing. Overall, prioritising testing of highly coupled components/interfaces can be a valid approach for systematic integration testing. ‘ High-coverage metamorphic testing of concurrency C compilers an approach and automated toolbox randomised testing of C compilers, checking whether C compilers concurrency in accordance the expected C11 semantics. ’ experimental results some interesting code relating concurrency, detects fence","PeriodicalId":49506,"journal":{"name":"Software Testing Verification & Reliability","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Software Testing Verification & Reliability","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/stvr.1817","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The first paper, ‘ Towards using coupling measures to guide black-box integration testing in component-based systems ’ concerns integration testing in component-based systems. The authors investigate the correlation between component and interface coupling measures found in literature and the number of observed failures at two architectural levels: the component level and the software interface level. The finding serves as a first step towards an approach for systematic selection of test cases during integration testing of a distributed component-based software system with black-box components. For example, the number of coupled elements may be an indicator for failure-proneness and can be used to guide test case prioritisation during system integration testing; data-flow-based coupling measurements may not capture the nature of an automotive software system and thus are inapplicable; having a grey box model may improve system integration testing. Overall, prioritising testing of highly coupled components/interfaces can be a valid approach for systematic integration testing. ‘ High-coverage metamorphic testing of concurrency C compilers an approach and automated toolbox randomised testing of C compilers, checking whether C compilers concurrency in accordance the expected C11 semantics. ’ experimental results some interesting code relating concurrency, detects fence
集成测试和变形测试
第一篇论文《在基于组件的系统中使用耦合度量来指导黑盒集成测试》关注的是基于组件的系统中的集成测试。作者研究了文献中发现的组件和接口耦合度量之间的相关性,以及在两个体系结构级别上观察到的故障数量:组件级别和软件接口级别。这个发现可以作为在集成测试过程中系统地选择带有黑盒组件的分布式组件软件系统的测试用例方法的第一步。例如,耦合元素的数量可能是故障倾向的指示器,并且可以用于在系统集成测试期间指导测试用例的优先级;基于数据流的耦合测量可能无法捕捉汽车软件系统的本质,因此不适用;使用灰盒模型可以改进系统集成测试。总的来说,对高度耦合的组件/接口进行优先级测试是一种有效的系统集成测试方法。C编译器并发性的高覆盖率变形测试一种方法和自动工具箱随机测试C编译器,检查C编译器并发性是否符合预期的C11语义。实验结果一些有趣的代码涉及并发,检测栅栏
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Software Testing Verification & Reliability
Software Testing Verification & Reliability 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is the premier outlet for research results on the subjects of testing, verification and reliability. Readers will find useful research on issues pertaining to building better software and evaluating it. The journal is unique in its emphasis on theoretical foundations and applications to real-world software development. The balance of theory, empirical work, and practical applications provide readers with better techniques for testing, verifying and improving the reliability of software. The journal targets researchers, practitioners, educators and students that have a vested interest in results generated by high-quality testing, verification and reliability modeling and evaluation of software. Topics of special interest include, but are not limited to: -New criteria for software testing and verification -Application of existing software testing and verification techniques to new types of software, including web applications, web services, embedded software, aspect-oriented software, and software architectures -Model based testing -Formal verification techniques such as model-checking -Comparison of testing and verification techniques -Measurement of and metrics for testing, verification and reliability -Industrial experience with cutting edge techniques -Descriptions and evaluations of commercial and open-source software testing tools -Reliability modeling, measurement and application -Testing and verification of software security -Automated test data generation -Process issues and methods -Non-functional testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信