Contrasting the role of trustworthy versus fair supervisors in organizational justice models of policing outcomes

IF 1.4 3区社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management Pub Date : 2022-10-25 DOI:10.1108/pijpsm-07-2022-0099

R. P. Peacock, Sanja Kutnjak Ivkovich, Krunoslav Borovec, Irena Cajner Mraović

{"title":"Contrasting the role of trustworthy versus fair supervisors in organizational justice models of policing outcomes","authors":"R. P. Peacock, Sanja Kutnjak Ivkovich, Krunoslav Borovec, Irena Cajner Mraović","doi":"10.1108/pijpsm-07-2022-0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThough contemporary police organizational behavior scholars often limit their measure of organizational justice to just supervisory procedural justice, this study examines how the additional dimensions of supervisor trustworthiness and peer procedural justice compare with procedural justice in their role shaping police outcomes.Design/methodology/approachA survey of 638 police officers in Zagreb, Croatia, was used to regress three separate dimensions of organizational justice on key officer attitudes toward their duties.FindingsThe authors found that supervisor trustworthiness and peer procedural justice were the dominant predictors of officers' rule compliance and trust in the public.Originality/valueThe findings suggest that police scholars and practitioners seeking to better understand the role of officer judgments on resisting agency reform should consider the precedent in corporate behavior research to specifically test the unique roles of multiple components of police organizational behavior on policing outcomes.","PeriodicalId":47881,"journal":{"name":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-07-2022-0099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThough contemporary police organizational behavior scholars often limit their measure of organizational justice to just supervisory procedural justice, this study examines how the additional dimensions of supervisor trustworthiness and peer procedural justice compare with procedural justice in their role shaping police outcomes.Design/methodology/approachA survey of 638 police officers in Zagreb, Croatia, was used to regress three separate dimensions of organizational justice on key officer attitudes toward their duties.FindingsThe authors found that supervisor trustworthiness and peer procedural justice were the dominant predictors of officers' rule compliance and trust in the public.Originality/valueThe findings suggest that police scholars and practitioners seeking to better understand the role of officer judgments on resisting agency reform should consider the precedent in corporate behavior research to specifically test the unique roles of multiple components of police organizational behavior on policing outcomes.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对比值得信赖的监督者和公平监督者在警务结果的组织公正模型中的作用

尽管当代警察组织行为学者经常将他们对组织公正的衡量限制在监督程序公正上，但本研究探讨了监督可信度和同伴程序公正的额外维度与程序公正在塑造警察结果方面的作用。设计/方法/方法对克罗地亚萨格勒布的638名警官进行了一项调查，以使组织公正的三个不同方面对主要警官对其职责的态度进行回归。作者发现，主管的可信度和同伴的程序公正是官员遵守规则和公众信任的主要预测因素。原创性/价值研究结果表明，试图更好地理解官员判断在抵制机构改革中的作用的警察学者和实践者应该考虑公司行为研究中的先例，以具体测试警察组织行为的多个组成部分对警务结果的独特作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

15.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： ■Community policing ■Managerial styles and leadership ■Performance measurement and accountability ■Pursuit guidelines ■Crime trends and analysis ■Crisis negotiation ■Civil disorder ■Organized crime ■Victimology ■Crime prevention ■Career development ■High risk police activities ■Routine policing ■Traffic enforcement ■Civil litigation.