Rating inter-rater reliability of Shih–Hsu Test of attention between an experienced psychiatric occupational therapist and an occupational therapy student: A pilot study
{"title":"Rating inter-rater reliability of Shih–Hsu Test of attention between an experienced psychiatric occupational therapist and an occupational therapy student: A pilot study","authors":"Yi-Nuo Shih, Chia-Chun Wu, Pei-En Shih, Jia- Hsu, Yin- Liao","doi":"10.4103/tpsy.tpsy_26_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The “Shih-Hsu Test of Attention” (SHTA) is an iPad-based attention assessment tool developed by occupational therapists in recent years, and has acceptable criterion-related validity and high test–retest reliability in preliminary application. In this study, we intended to explore the inter-rater reliability of SHTA between experienced and inexperienced occupational therapists. Methods: We recruited 24 voluntary study participants aged 20–24 years in this study. The participants completed twice the SHTA by an experienced occupational therapist and an occupational therapy student. Results: Analytical results showed that the inter-rater reliability between experienced and inexperienced occupational therapists using SHTA had satisfactory reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.65). Conclusion: Our preliminary findings showed that the new attention assessment tool, SHTA, had satisfactory inter-rater reliability between experienced and occupational therapy students. We need to wait for a future study with more numbers of study participants in both groups to strengthen the study finding of this pilot study. At this moment, we suggest improving the guidance and training for inexperienced occupational therapists to improve accuracy, and reducing the gap when testing with experienced occupational therapists in future.","PeriodicalId":22278,"journal":{"name":"Taiwanese Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"64 1","pages":"138 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwanese Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tpsy.tpsy_26_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The “Shih-Hsu Test of Attention” (SHTA) is an iPad-based attention assessment tool developed by occupational therapists in recent years, and has acceptable criterion-related validity and high test–retest reliability in preliminary application. In this study, we intended to explore the inter-rater reliability of SHTA between experienced and inexperienced occupational therapists. Methods: We recruited 24 voluntary study participants aged 20–24 years in this study. The participants completed twice the SHTA by an experienced occupational therapist and an occupational therapy student. Results: Analytical results showed that the inter-rater reliability between experienced and inexperienced occupational therapists using SHTA had satisfactory reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.65). Conclusion: Our preliminary findings showed that the new attention assessment tool, SHTA, had satisfactory inter-rater reliability between experienced and occupational therapy students. We need to wait for a future study with more numbers of study participants in both groups to strengthen the study finding of this pilot study. At this moment, we suggest improving the guidance and training for inexperienced occupational therapists to improve accuracy, and reducing the gap when testing with experienced occupational therapists in future.
目的:“施许注意测验”(Shih-Hsu Test of Attention, SHTA)是近年来由职业治疗师开发的一种基于ipad的注意评估工具,在初步应用中具有良好的标准相关效度和较高的重测信度。本研究旨在探讨经验丰富与经验不足的职业治疗师间SHTA的信度。方法:我们招募了24名年龄在20-24岁之间的志愿者。参与者分别由一名经验丰富的职业治疗师和一名职业治疗学生完成两次SHTA。结果:分析结果显示,经验丰富的职业治疗师和经验不足的职业治疗师在使用SHTA时具有满意的信度(类内相关系数= 0.65)。结论:我们的初步研究结果表明,新的注意力评估工具SHTA在经验治疗学生和职业治疗学生之间具有令人满意的信度。我们需要等待未来的研究,在两组中有更多的研究参与者,以加强本初步研究的研究发现。此时,我们建议加强对经验不足的职业治疗师的指导和培训,以提高准确性,并在未来减少与经验丰富的职业治疗师测试时的差距。