{"title":"A practical framework to assess the sustainability and resiliency of civil infrastructure","authors":"T. Robbins, B. Chittoori","doi":"10.1680/jensu.20.00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research within civil engineering is focusing on newer ideas and philosophies such as sustainability and resiliency (S&R). This is evident in the development of frameworks to assess sustainability or the resiliency of civil infrastructure. Several frameworks were developed by researchers to quantify sustainability and resiliency of civil infrastructure. It is evident that the sustainability and resiliency are not mutually exclusive and is important to asses these aspects at the same time and frameworks be able to accommodate simultaneous assessments. While there are other frameworks that follow a unified approach to S&R assessments, they do not account for the risk of the hazard as a part of the framework. In the proposed framework, an attempt was made to include the risk of the hazard as a part of the assessment to gain a realistic perspective of the hazard impact. This paper presents explicit steps to use the framework, along with an example of using the frame work in assessing an earthen dam subjected to two types of hazards, earthquakes and floods. Novel aspects of this framework revolve around the simplicity, and flexibility of the framework. Major input parameters are user-defined, which allows for a wide range of variable to be considered when determining the overall quality of the infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":49671,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability","volume":"7 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.20.00010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Research within civil engineering is focusing on newer ideas and philosophies such as sustainability and resiliency (S&R). This is evident in the development of frameworks to assess sustainability or the resiliency of civil infrastructure. Several frameworks were developed by researchers to quantify sustainability and resiliency of civil infrastructure. It is evident that the sustainability and resiliency are not mutually exclusive and is important to asses these aspects at the same time and frameworks be able to accommodate simultaneous assessments. While there are other frameworks that follow a unified approach to S&R assessments, they do not account for the risk of the hazard as a part of the framework. In the proposed framework, an attempt was made to include the risk of the hazard as a part of the assessment to gain a realistic perspective of the hazard impact. This paper presents explicit steps to use the framework, along with an example of using the frame work in assessing an earthen dam subjected to two types of hazards, earthquakes and floods. Novel aspects of this framework revolve around the simplicity, and flexibility of the framework. Major input parameters are user-defined, which allows for a wide range of variable to be considered when determining the overall quality of the infrastructure.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Sustainability provides a forum for sharing the latest thinking from research and practice, and increasingly is presenting the ''how to'' of engineering a resilient future. The journal features refereed papers and shorter articles relating to the pursuit and implementation of sustainability principles through engineering planning, design and application. The tensions between and integration of social, economic and environmental considerations within such schemes are of particular relevance. Methodologies for assessing sustainability, policy issues, education and corporate responsibility will also be included. The aims will be met primarily by providing papers and briefing notes (including case histories and best practice guidance) of use to decision-makers, practitioners, researchers and students.