Quality of life deterioration and associated factors in prenatal care pregnant women: assessment with the WHOQOL-BREF scale

Á. Monterrosa-Castro, Isabella Morales-Castellar, Alix Rodelo-Correa, Angélica Monterrosa-Blanco
{"title":"Quality of life deterioration and associated factors in prenatal care pregnant women: assessment with the WHOQOL-BREF scale","authors":"Á. Monterrosa-Castro, Isabella Morales-Castellar, Alix Rodelo-Correa, Angélica Monterrosa-Blanco","doi":"10.53986/ibjm.2023.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Quality of life is a set of situations that contribute to people's well-being. In pregnant women, it is necessary to explore the emotional, social and physical aspects. Few studies in the Latin American population explore the quality of life of pregnant women. The objective was to establish the frequency of deterioration of the physical, psychological, social and environmental quality of life and to identify the associated factors in pregnant women residing in cities of the Colombian Caribbean who attended prenatal consultation. Material and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 509 pregnant women who performed daily activities and participated voluntarily and anonymously after signing informed consent. They filled out a form that explored sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and applied the WHOQOL-BREF scale, identifying the poor quality of life. Adjusted logistic regression was performed to estimate the association between quality of life (dependent variable) and biopsychosocial factors (independent variables). Results: The age of the participants was 26.8 ± 6.2 years. In 250 (49.1%) physical or mental deterioration was identified, in 281 (55.2%) deterioration of the social relationship and in 270 (53.0%) of the environmental relationship. Diabetes OR:6.01[95%CI:1.20-18.42], depression OR:4.71[95%CI:1-20-18.42], living in a rural area OR:2.96[95%CI :1.78-4.91], anguish with pregnancy OR:2.87[95%CI:1.65-5.01], financial problems OR:2.61[95%CI:1.54-4.40 ] or couple OR:2.60[95%CI:1.03-6.69], were associated with impaired quality of life (p<0.01). Being cohabiting, compared to being alone, and being a student/employee versus a housewife, were associated with a lower possibility of deterioration in quality of life (p<0.01). Conclusions: Deterioration of each quality of life domain was identified in half of the pregnant women and several biopsychosocial factors were significantly associated. Antenatal care protocols should provide guidelines for intervention on obstetric and non-obstetric factors that impair quality of life. It is necessary to highlight deficiencies in the exploration of the mental, social and environmental health of pregnant women.","PeriodicalId":13190,"journal":{"name":"Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53986/ibjm.2023.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Quality of life is a set of situations that contribute to people's well-being. In pregnant women, it is necessary to explore the emotional, social and physical aspects. Few studies in the Latin American population explore the quality of life of pregnant women. The objective was to establish the frequency of deterioration of the physical, psychological, social and environmental quality of life and to identify the associated factors in pregnant women residing in cities of the Colombian Caribbean who attended prenatal consultation. Material and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 509 pregnant women who performed daily activities and participated voluntarily and anonymously after signing informed consent. They filled out a form that explored sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and applied the WHOQOL-BREF scale, identifying the poor quality of life. Adjusted logistic regression was performed to estimate the association between quality of life (dependent variable) and biopsychosocial factors (independent variables). Results: The age of the participants was 26.8 ± 6.2 years. In 250 (49.1%) physical or mental deterioration was identified, in 281 (55.2%) deterioration of the social relationship and in 270 (53.0%) of the environmental relationship. Diabetes OR:6.01[95%CI:1.20-18.42], depression OR:4.71[95%CI:1-20-18.42], living in a rural area OR:2.96[95%CI :1.78-4.91], anguish with pregnancy OR:2.87[95%CI:1.65-5.01], financial problems OR:2.61[95%CI:1.54-4.40 ] or couple OR:2.60[95%CI:1.03-6.69], were associated with impaired quality of life (p<0.01). Being cohabiting, compared to being alone, and being a student/employee versus a housewife, were associated with a lower possibility of deterioration in quality of life (p<0.01). Conclusions: Deterioration of each quality of life domain was identified in half of the pregnant women and several biopsychosocial factors were significantly associated. Antenatal care protocols should provide guidelines for intervention on obstetric and non-obstetric factors that impair quality of life. It is necessary to highlight deficiencies in the exploration of the mental, social and environmental health of pregnant women.
产前护理孕妇生活质量恶化及相关因素:用WHOQOL-BREF量表评估
引言:生活质量是一组有助于人们幸福的情况。在孕妇中,有必要探索情感、社会和身体方面。在拉丁美洲人口中很少有研究探讨孕妇的生活质量。目的是确定身体、心理、社会和环境生活质量恶化的频率,并查明居住在哥伦比亚加勒比各城市参加产前咨询的孕妇的相关因素。材料与方法:对509名孕妇进行横断面研究,这些孕妇在签署知情同意书后自愿匿名参加日常活动。他们填写了一份表格,探讨了社会人口学和临床特征,并应用了WHOQOL-BREF量表,以确定生活质量差。采用调整后的逻辑回归来估计生活质量(因变量)和生物心理社会因素(自变量)之间的关系。结果:患者年龄26.8±6.2岁。250例(49.1%)被认为身体或精神恶化,281例(55.2%)被认为社会关系恶化,270例(53.0%)被认为环境关系恶化。糖尿病OR:6.01[95%CI:1.20-18.42],抑郁症OR:4.71[95%CI:1-20-18.42],生活在农村OR:2.96[95%CI:1.78-4.91],怀孕痛苦OR:2.87[95%CI:1.65-5.01],经济问题OR:2.61[95%CI:1.54-4.40]或夫妻OR:2.60[95%CI:1.03-6.69]与生活质量受损相关(p<0.01)。与独居相比,与学生/雇员相比,与家庭主妇相比,同居的生活质量下降的可能性更低(p<0.01)。结论:半数孕妇的生活质量各方面均出现恶化,且多种生物心理社会因素显著相关。产前保健协议应提供指导方针,干预影响生活质量的产科和非产科因素。有必要强调在探索孕妇的心理、社会和环境健康方面存在的不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信