Endovascular biometrics and engineering

R. Goloshchapov-Aksenov, Голощапов-Аксёнов Роман Сергеевич, D. Kicha, Кича Дмитрий Иванович
{"title":"Endovascular biometrics and engineering","authors":"R. Goloshchapov-Aksenov, Голощапов-Аксёнов Роман Сергеевич, D. Kicha, Кича Дмитрий Иванович","doi":"10.17816/kmj2020-507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To study technical problems in the provision of endovascular care and to develop technological solutions for its improvement based on endovascular biometry. Methods. For the period 2015–2019 an expert analysis of the results of endovascular treatment of 1546 patients with chronic lower limb ischemia was performed, in which it was not possible to perform lower limb revascularization according to the standard method using a guide catheter, guidewire and balloon catheter. The expert group inclu­ded 5 interventional radiologists who performed endovascular procedures. The results were assessed by the effectiveness of revascularization using the developed innovative technology from a system of catheters of various diameters and stiffness in comparison with the results of using standard endovascular technique. Calculation of adequate statistical indicators and their reliability were undertaken using Statistica software (version 6.0). Results. The “critical” and “weak” zones of the vascular bed were identified for the first time to substantiate the development of a technology for safe and effective endovascular revascularization. It has been established that technical difficulties in catheterization of vessels create the prevalence of atherosclerotic lesions and the limited technical capabilities of catheters and guidewires, which are manipulated under the conditions of increasing high friction with the vessel wall caused by tortuosity and atherosclerosis, the presence of “weak” and “critical” zones of the blood vessels, as well as a significant distance from the surgeon's hands to the area of medical manipulation, ­reaching 130–200 cm. The developed innovative design from the catheter system ensured the effectiveness of endovascular lower limb revascularization in all patients (100%) using the femoral and brachial accesses compare to the standard technique of endovascular care (p <0.001). Conclusion. Endovascular instruments offered on the domestic market do not guarantee the effective completion of revascularization. The technology of vascular catheterization developed based on endovascular biometry ensures the successful completion of revascularization in 100% of cases.","PeriodicalId":17798,"journal":{"name":"Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/kmj2020-507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To study technical problems in the provision of endovascular care and to develop technological solutions for its improvement based on endovascular biometry. Methods. For the period 2015–2019 an expert analysis of the results of endovascular treatment of 1546 patients with chronic lower limb ischemia was performed, in which it was not possible to perform lower limb revascularization according to the standard method using a guide catheter, guidewire and balloon catheter. The expert group inclu­ded 5 interventional radiologists who performed endovascular procedures. The results were assessed by the effectiveness of revascularization using the developed innovative technology from a system of catheters of various diameters and stiffness in comparison with the results of using standard endovascular technique. Calculation of adequate statistical indicators and their reliability were undertaken using Statistica software (version 6.0). Results. The “critical” and “weak” zones of the vascular bed were identified for the first time to substantiate the development of a technology for safe and effective endovascular revascularization. It has been established that technical difficulties in catheterization of vessels create the prevalence of atherosclerotic lesions and the limited technical capabilities of catheters and guidewires, which are manipulated under the conditions of increasing high friction with the vessel wall caused by tortuosity and atherosclerosis, the presence of “weak” and “critical” zones of the blood vessels, as well as a significant distance from the surgeon's hands to the area of medical manipulation, ­reaching 130–200 cm. The developed innovative design from the catheter system ensured the effectiveness of endovascular lower limb revascularization in all patients (100%) using the femoral and brachial accesses compare to the standard technique of endovascular care (p <0.001). Conclusion. Endovascular instruments offered on the domestic market do not guarantee the effective completion of revascularization. The technology of vascular catheterization developed based on endovascular biometry ensures the successful completion of revascularization in 100% of cases.
血管内生物识别与工程
的目标。研究血管内护理中存在的技术问题,提出基于血管内生物计量技术的技术改进方案。方法。2015-2019年专家分析了1546例慢性下肢缺血患者的血管内治疗结果,其中无法按照标准方法使用导管、导丝、球囊导管进行下肢血运重建术。专家组包括5名进行血管内手术的介入放射科医生。通过与使用标准血管内技术的结果进行比较,通过使用不同直径和硬度的导管系统开发的创新技术来评估血运重建的有效性。使用Statistica软件(6.0版)计算适当的统计指标及其信度。结果。首次确定了血管床的“关键”和“薄弱”区域,证实了安全有效的血管内重建术技术的发展。已经确定,导管置入的技术困难造成了动脉粥样硬化病变的普遍存在,导管和导丝的技术能力有限,这些导管和导丝是在扭曲和动脉粥样硬化引起的与血管壁的高度摩擦增加的条件下操作的,存在血管的"薄弱"和"关键"区域,以及外科医生的手距离医疗操作区域很远的情况下操作的。-达到130-200厘米。与标准的血管内护理技术相比,该导管系统的创新设计确保了所有患者(100%)使用股骨和肱通道进行血管内下肢血运重建术的有效性(p <0.001)。结论。国内市场上提供的血管内器械不能保证有效完成血运重建。基于血管内生物测量技术开发的血管导管技术确保100%的病例成功完成血运重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信