Critical, contextualized, content-rich: revisiting the call for humanizing pedagogies in literacy methods instruction

IF 0.8 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kathleen L. Riley, Katherine Crawford-Garrett
{"title":"Critical, contextualized, content-rich: revisiting the call for humanizing pedagogies in literacy methods instruction","authors":"Kathleen L. Riley, Katherine Crawford-Garrett","doi":"10.1108/etpc-08-2020-0098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn this study, the authors draw upon 10 years of collaborative teaching and research as two, White, women literacy teacher educators to theorize the role of humanizing pedagogies within literacy teacher education and share explicit examples of how these pedagogies might be operationalized in actual classroom settings.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study is based on 10 years of qualitative, teacher inquiry research on authors’ shared practice as literacy teacher educators and has included focus groups with students, the collection of student work and extensive field notes on class sessions.\n\n\nFindings\nContextualized within decades-old calls for humanizing teacher education practices, this study puts forward a framework for teaching literacy methods that centers critical, locally contextualized, content-rich approaches and provides detailed examples of how this study implemented this framework in two contrastive teacher education settings comprising different institutional barriers, regional student populations and program mandates.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe proposed framework of critical, locally contextualized and content-rich literacy methods offers one possibility for reconciling the divergent debates that perpetually shape literacy teaching and learning. As teachers are prepared to enter classrooms, the authors model concrete approaches and strategies for teaching reading within and against a sociopolitical landscape imbued with White supremacist ideals and racial bias.\n","PeriodicalId":45885,"journal":{"name":"English Teaching-Practice and Critique","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Teaching-Practice and Critique","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-08-2020-0098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose In this study, the authors draw upon 10 years of collaborative teaching and research as two, White, women literacy teacher educators to theorize the role of humanizing pedagogies within literacy teacher education and share explicit examples of how these pedagogies might be operationalized in actual classroom settings. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on 10 years of qualitative, teacher inquiry research on authors’ shared practice as literacy teacher educators and has included focus groups with students, the collection of student work and extensive field notes on class sessions. Findings Contextualized within decades-old calls for humanizing teacher education practices, this study puts forward a framework for teaching literacy methods that centers critical, locally contextualized, content-rich approaches and provides detailed examples of how this study implemented this framework in two contrastive teacher education settings comprising different institutional barriers, regional student populations and program mandates. Originality/value The proposed framework of critical, locally contextualized and content-rich literacy methods offers one possibility for reconciling the divergent debates that perpetually shape literacy teaching and learning. As teachers are prepared to enter classrooms, the authors model concrete approaches and strategies for teaching reading within and against a sociopolitical landscape imbued with White supremacist ideals and racial bias.
批判性的、情境化的、内容丰富的:重新审视在读写方法教学中对人性化教学法的呼吁
在本研究中,作者借鉴了10年的合作教学和研究,作为两个,怀特,女性扫盲教师教育者,理论化人性化教学法在扫盲教师教育中的作用,并分享了这些教学法如何在实际课堂环境中运作的明确例子。设计/方法/方法本研究基于10年的定性、教师探究性研究,研究作者作为扫盲教师的共同实践,包括与学生进行焦点小组讨论、收集学生作业和广泛的课堂现场笔记。在几十年来呼吁教师教育实践人性化的背景下,本研究提出了一个教学识字方法的框架,该框架以关键的、当地情境化的、内容丰富的方法为中心,并提供了详细的例子,说明本研究如何在两种截然不同的教师教育环境中实施该框架,包括不同的制度障碍、地区学生人数和项目任务。原创性/价值提出的批判性、本地情境化和内容丰富的识字方法框架,为调和不断影响识字教学和学习的分歧辩论提供了一种可能性。当教师们准备进入课堂时,作者们在充满白人至上主义理想和种族偏见的社会政治环境中为教学提供了具体的方法和策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: English Teaching: Practice and Critique seeks to promote research and theory related to English literacy that is grounded in a range of contexts: classrooms, schools and wider educational constituencies. The journal has as its main focus English teaching in L1 settings. Submissions focused on EFL will be considered only if they have clear pertinence to English literacy in L1 settings. It provides a place where authors from a range of backgrounds can identify matters of common concern and thereby foster broad professional communities and networks. Where possible, English Teaching: Practice and Critique encourages comparative approaches to topics and issues. The journal published three types of manuscripts: research articles, essays (theoretical papers, reviews, and responses), and teacher narratives. Often special issues of the journal focus on distinct topics; however, unthemed manuscript submissions are always welcome and published in most issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信