Prescribing Patterns of Continuous Infusions in Nonobese versus Obese Children Admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Saude Tecnologia Pub Date : 2019-12-01 Epub Date: 2019-06-21 DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1692669
Peter N Johnson, Katy Stephens, Philip Barker, Erica Bergeron, Sin Yin Lim, Tracy M Hagemann, Teresa V Lewis, Stephen Neely, Jamie L Miller
{"title":"Prescribing Patterns of Continuous Infusions in Nonobese versus Obese Children Admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Peter N Johnson, Katy Stephens, Philip Barker, Erica Bergeron, Sin Yin Lim, Tracy M Hagemann, Teresa V Lewis, Stephen Neely, Jamie L Miller","doi":"10.1055/s-0039-1692669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective study compared the continuous infusions prescribed for obese and nonobese children. Ninety-five (13.2%) received an infusion. A greater percentage of obese ( <i>n</i>  = 42/168) versus nonobese (53/552) children received infusions, <i>p</i>  < 0.01. No difference was noted in the median number of infusions between the obese and nonobese groups, 2 versus 2, <i>p</i>  = 0.975. The top 20 prescribed infusions included ten (50%) for sedation/analgesia or neuromuscular blockade and six (30%) for hemodynamic support. A literature search was performed for these 20 agents to determine pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and dosing in obese children and revealed six studies evaluating fentanyl ( <i>n</i>  = 2), midazolam ( <i>n</i>  = 1), and propofol ( <i>n</i>  = 3).</p>","PeriodicalId":30555,"journal":{"name":"Saude Tecnologia","volume":"1 1","pages":"226-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6821521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saude Tecnologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1692669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This retrospective study compared the continuous infusions prescribed for obese and nonobese children. Ninety-five (13.2%) received an infusion. A greater percentage of obese ( n  = 42/168) versus nonobese (53/552) children received infusions, p  < 0.01. No difference was noted in the median number of infusions between the obese and nonobese groups, 2 versus 2, p  = 0.975. The top 20 prescribed infusions included ten (50%) for sedation/analgesia or neuromuscular blockade and six (30%) for hemodynamic support. A literature search was performed for these 20 agents to determine pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and dosing in obese children and revealed six studies evaluating fentanyl ( n  = 2), midazolam ( n  = 1), and propofol ( n  = 3).

儿科重症监护室收治的非肥胖儿童与肥胖儿童的持续输液处方模式。
这项回顾性研究比较了为肥胖儿童和非肥胖儿童开具的持续输液处方。95名儿童(13.2%)接受了输液治疗。与非肥胖儿童(53/552)相比,肥胖儿童(42/168)接受输液的比例更高,P = 0.975。开具处方最多的 20 种输液中,10 种(50%)用于镇静/镇痛或神经肌肉阻滞,6 种(30%)用于血液动力学支持。我们对这 20 种药物进行了文献检索,以确定肥胖儿童的药代动力学、药效学和剂量,结果发现有六项研究对芬太尼(n = 2)、咪达唑仑(n = 1)和异丙酚(n = 3)进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信