Information literacy of matriculating chiropractic students assessed via research readiness survey.

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Krista L Ward, Barbara L Delli Gatti, Annette Osenga, Donna H Odierna, Monica Smith
{"title":"Information literacy of matriculating chiropractic students assessed via research readiness survey.","authors":"Krista L Ward,&nbsp;Barbara L Delli Gatti,&nbsp;Annette Osenga,&nbsp;Donna H Odierna,&nbsp;Monica Smith","doi":"10.7899/JCE-21-48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We developed a Research Readiness Survey (RRS) to identify students' information literacy needs prior to instruction by a team of faculty members and librarians in our doctor of chiropractic program clinical research literacy courses. In addition to describing students' responses to our RRS, we explored associations between (1) students' overall performance on the RRS and their prior earned degrees and (2) their self-reported ability and performance on questions pertaining to evaluating information quality (standard 3 of the Association of College and Research Libraries [ACRL] Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RRS is composed of 50 questions, of which 22 pertain to information literacy knowledge assessment per ACRL standards. We calculated means and standard deviations for summary scores on 4 ACRL standards and for a total RRS score. We used analysis of variance to assess whether standard 3 scores differed by students' self-reported ability to judge health information quality and whether there was an association between total RRS scores and students' previously earned degrees.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2017-2018, 245 students (70% of matriculates) completed the RRS. Students performed best on standard 3 (average score 67%) and worst on standard 2, the ability to access information (average score = 59%). Students who reported an average ability to judge information quality had higher standard 3 scores than students who reported poor ability (p = .003). Students with bachelor's degrees had higher total RRS scores than students with associate's degrees (p = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Matriculating students had the most difficulty with accessing information, supporting the need to include librarians on the teaching team.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013592/pdf/i2374-250X-37-1-20.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-21-48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: We developed a Research Readiness Survey (RRS) to identify students' information literacy needs prior to instruction by a team of faculty members and librarians in our doctor of chiropractic program clinical research literacy courses. In addition to describing students' responses to our RRS, we explored associations between (1) students' overall performance on the RRS and their prior earned degrees and (2) their self-reported ability and performance on questions pertaining to evaluating information quality (standard 3 of the Association of College and Research Libraries [ACRL] Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education).

Methods: The RRS is composed of 50 questions, of which 22 pertain to information literacy knowledge assessment per ACRL standards. We calculated means and standard deviations for summary scores on 4 ACRL standards and for a total RRS score. We used analysis of variance to assess whether standard 3 scores differed by students' self-reported ability to judge health information quality and whether there was an association between total RRS scores and students' previously earned degrees.

Results: In 2017-2018, 245 students (70% of matriculates) completed the RRS. Students performed best on standard 3 (average score 67%) and worst on standard 2, the ability to access information (average score = 59%). Students who reported an average ability to judge information quality had higher standard 3 scores than students who reported poor ability (p = .003). Students with bachelor's degrees had higher total RRS scores than students with associate's degrees (p = .004).

Conclusion: Matriculating students had the most difficulty with accessing information, supporting the need to include librarians on the teaching team.

通过研究准备调查评估脊医学生的信息素养。
目的:我们开发了一个研究准备调查(RRS),以确定学生的信息素养需求之前,由一组教师和图书馆员指导我们的脊椎按摩医生项目临床研究素养课程。除了描述学生对我们的RRS的反应之外,我们还探讨了(1)学生在RRS上的整体表现与他们之前获得的学位之间的联系,(2)他们在评估信息质量问题上的自我报告能力和表现(大学和研究图书馆协会[ACRL]高等教育信息素养能力标准标准3)。方法:RRS由50个问题组成,其中22个问题涉及ACRL标准下的信息素养知识评估。我们计算了4个ACRL标准的总得分和总RRS得分的均值和标准差。我们使用方差分析来评估标准3分数是否因学生自我报告的判断健康信息质量的能力而不同,以及总RRS分数与学生以前获得的学位之间是否存在关联。结果:2017-2018年,有245名学生(占预科生的70%)完成了RRS。学生在标准3上表现最好(平均得分为67%),在标准2上表现最差(平均得分为59%)。报告平均判断信息质量能力的学生比报告能力差的学生有更高的标准3分(p = 0.003)。学士学位学生的RRS总分高于副学士学位学生(p = 0.004)。结论:入学学生在获取信息方面最困难,这支持了将图书馆员纳入教学团队的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Education
Journal of Chiropractic Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
37.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chiropractic Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing research and scholarly articles pertaining to education theory, pedagogy, methodologies, practice, and other content relevant to the health professions academe. Journal contents are of interest to teachers, researchers, clinical educators, administrators, and students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信