Developing Benchmarks For Prior Learning Assessment: An Exploratory Study

M. Day
{"title":"Developing Benchmarks For Prior Learning Assessment: An Exploratory Study","authors":"M. Day","doi":"10.19030/AJHS.V2I2.6628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior Learning Assessment (or PLA) has assumed a new importance for Nurse Education in the UK as the Nursing and Midwifery Council has recently indicated that up to 50% of the pre registration nursing programme could be achieved by an individual – through an assessment of their prior learning. [1]. However, despite the emergence of PLA guidelines for higher education institutions [2], the assessment of prior learning in UK universities is still: \"Characterized by inconsistency and lack of coherence.” [3] .This paper discusses the results o f an exploratory study, which attempted to make the practice of PLA in UK Schools of Nursing clearer and much more explicit. A benchmarking approach is used, based on original work conducted within North America [4]. The findings show that benchmarks for PLA can identify the key purpose; functions and activities associated with the PLA Adviser and PLA Assessor role. Also, contrary to the literature PLA methodology is not based on any particular ideology. Rather, it appears to be context dependent and is more likely to be influenced by: (a) the needs of the individual; (b) the time and resources that are available; and (c) university regulations. This finding suggests that a more eclectic approach towards PLA might now be emerging within UK Schools of Nursing. Each of these findings is now the subject of further study.","PeriodicalId":89884,"journal":{"name":"American journal of health sciences","volume":"21 1","pages":"53-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/AJHS.V2I2.6628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Prior Learning Assessment (or PLA) has assumed a new importance for Nurse Education in the UK as the Nursing and Midwifery Council has recently indicated that up to 50% of the pre registration nursing programme could be achieved by an individual – through an assessment of their prior learning. [1]. However, despite the emergence of PLA guidelines for higher education institutions [2], the assessment of prior learning in UK universities is still: "Characterized by inconsistency and lack of coherence.” [3] .This paper discusses the results o f an exploratory study, which attempted to make the practice of PLA in UK Schools of Nursing clearer and much more explicit. A benchmarking approach is used, based on original work conducted within North America [4]. The findings show that benchmarks for PLA can identify the key purpose; functions and activities associated with the PLA Adviser and PLA Assessor role. Also, contrary to the literature PLA methodology is not based on any particular ideology. Rather, it appears to be context dependent and is more likely to be influenced by: (a) the needs of the individual; (b) the time and resources that are available; and (c) university regulations. This finding suggests that a more eclectic approach towards PLA might now be emerging within UK Schools of Nursing. Each of these findings is now the subject of further study.
建立先前学习评估基准:一项探索性研究
先前学习评估(或PLA)对英国护士教育具有新的重要性,因为护理和助产委员会最近指出,通过对其先前学习的评估,高达50%的预注册护理计划可以由个人实现。[1]。然而,尽管出现了针对高等教育机构的PLA指南[2],英国大学对先前学习的评估仍然是:“以不一致和缺乏连贯性为特征。[3]本文讨论了一项探索性研究的结果,该研究试图使PLA在英国护理学院的实践更加清晰和明确。基于在北美进行的原始工作[4],采用了基准方法。研究结果表明,解放军的基准可以确定关键目的;与人民解放军顾问和人民解放军评估员角色相关的职能和活动。此外,与文献相反,解放军的方法论不是基于任何特定的意识形态。相反,它似乎与环境有关,更有可能受到:(a)个人需要的影响;(b)可用的时间和资源;(c)大学规章制度。这一发现表明,英国护理学院可能正在采用一种更为折衷的方法来对待解放军。这些发现现在都是进一步研究的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信