Darren Haywood, Frank D Baughman, Barbara A Mullan, Karen R Heslop
{"title":"What Accounts for the Factors of Psychopathology? An Investigation of the Neurocognitive Correlates of Internalising, Externalising, and the <i>p</i>-Factor.","authors":"Darren Haywood, Frank D Baughman, Barbara A Mullan, Karen R Heslop","doi":"10.3390/brainsci12040421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neurocognitive deficits have been consistently associated with a wide range of psychopathology and are proposed to not only be a consequence of the development of psychopathology but also directly involved in its aetiology. However, there is no clear understanding of what neurocognitive processes are particularly important to mental health. In this paper, we explored the association between neurocognitive abilities and the factors derived from structural models of psychopathology. Four hundred participants from a representative community sample completed measures of symptomology and substance use, as well as 8 neurocognitive tasks. We found a correlated-factors model, with internalising and externalising as the higher-order factors, and a single-factor model with only the <i>p</i>-factor, to be good fits for the data. Tasks that measured the speed of processing were significantly associated with internalising, externalising, and the <i>p</i>-factor, and accounted for significant amounts of unique variance in the factors after accounting for the common variance of the other tasks. Tasks that measured working memory, shifting, and inhibition were not significantly associated with psychopathology factors. Our findings suggest that neurocognitive abilities may not be differentially associated with psychopathology factors, but that speed of processing is a common correlate of the factors. We emphasise the importance of examining neurocognitive abilities and psychopathology on the individual level.</p>","PeriodicalId":43935,"journal":{"name":"AFRICAN ECONOMIC HISTORY","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9030002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRICAN ECONOMIC HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12040421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Neurocognitive deficits have been consistently associated with a wide range of psychopathology and are proposed to not only be a consequence of the development of psychopathology but also directly involved in its aetiology. However, there is no clear understanding of what neurocognitive processes are particularly important to mental health. In this paper, we explored the association between neurocognitive abilities and the factors derived from structural models of psychopathology. Four hundred participants from a representative community sample completed measures of symptomology and substance use, as well as 8 neurocognitive tasks. We found a correlated-factors model, with internalising and externalising as the higher-order factors, and a single-factor model with only the p-factor, to be good fits for the data. Tasks that measured the speed of processing were significantly associated with internalising, externalising, and the p-factor, and accounted for significant amounts of unique variance in the factors after accounting for the common variance of the other tasks. Tasks that measured working memory, shifting, and inhibition were not significantly associated with psychopathology factors. Our findings suggest that neurocognitive abilities may not be differentially associated with psychopathology factors, but that speed of processing is a common correlate of the factors. We emphasise the importance of examining neurocognitive abilities and psychopathology on the individual level.
神经认知缺陷一直与各种精神病理学相关联,并被认为不仅是精神病理学发展的结果,还直接参与了其病因。然而,对于哪些神经认知过程对心理健康尤为重要,目前尚无明确的认识。在本文中,我们探讨了神经认知能力与精神病理学结构模型衍生因素之间的关联。来自具有代表性的社区样本的 400 名参与者完成了症状和药物使用的测量,以及 8 项神经认知任务。我们发现,以内化和外化为高阶因子的相关因子模型,以及仅包含 p 因子的单因子模型都能很好地拟合数据。测量处理速度的任务与内化、外化和 p 因子显著相关,并且在考虑了其他任务的共同方差后,在各因子中占了相当大的独特方差。测量工作记忆、移位和抑制的任务与精神病理学因素没有明显关联。我们的研究结果表明,神经认知能力可能与精神病理学因素没有不同的关联,但处理速度是这些因素的共同相关因素。我们强调从个体层面研究神经认知能力和精神病理学的重要性。