The relationship between irrealis mood and deontic modality in Paresi (Arawak)

Núbia Ferreira Rech, Ana Paula Barros Brandão, M. Wit
{"title":"The relationship between irrealis mood and deontic modality in Paresi (Arawak)","authors":"Núbia Ferreira Rech, Ana Paula Barros Brandão, M. Wit","doi":"10.20396/LIAMES.V18I2.8653075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a description and analysis of the deontic modality and its relationship with mood category (realis vs irrealis) in Paresi, a language of the Arawak family, spoken in Brazil. Data were collected from two questionnaires on deontics and texts. For the analysis of the data, we used, as the theoretical framework on mood and modality, the works of Feldman (1986), Hacquard (2006, 2010); Mithun (1995, 1999) and Palmer (2001). First, we show how the realis/irrealis mood marking occurs in Paresi. In the sequence, we describe the Paresi as a language that lexically marks the type of modality, but not the modal force. We present two markers of deontic modality in this language: maika and wa(iye)hena, which indicate both necesssity and possibility. These markers exhibit particle properties and occupy high positions in the sentence structure. Finally, we describe the deontic modality of necessity, showing that there are two types of obligations in Paresi: one indicated by the maika particle; and another, by the particle wa(iye)hena. The first figures, preferably, in contexts in which a participant is directly responsible for the realization of the event and seems to be associated to the realis mood. On the other hand, wa(iye)hena is employed in contexts of laws and general rules, which describe how a state of affairs should be, and co-occurs, predominantly, with the irrealis marker.","PeriodicalId":52952,"journal":{"name":"Liames","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liames","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/LIAMES.V18I2.8653075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article presents a description and analysis of the deontic modality and its relationship with mood category (realis vs irrealis) in Paresi, a language of the Arawak family, spoken in Brazil. Data were collected from two questionnaires on deontics and texts. For the analysis of the data, we used, as the theoretical framework on mood and modality, the works of Feldman (1986), Hacquard (2006, 2010); Mithun (1995, 1999) and Palmer (2001). First, we show how the realis/irrealis mood marking occurs in Paresi. In the sequence, we describe the Paresi as a language that lexically marks the type of modality, but not the modal force. We present two markers of deontic modality in this language: maika and wa(iye)hena, which indicate both necesssity and possibility. These markers exhibit particle properties and occupy high positions in the sentence structure. Finally, we describe the deontic modality of necessity, showing that there are two types of obligations in Paresi: one indicated by the maika particle; and another, by the particle wa(iye)hena. The first figures, preferably, in contexts in which a participant is directly responsible for the realization of the event and seems to be associated to the realis mood. On the other hand, wa(iye)hena is employed in contexts of laws and general rules, which describe how a state of affairs should be, and co-occurs, predominantly, with the irrealis marker.
非现实情态与义务情态的关系
本文描述和分析了巴西阿拉瓦克语Paresi语的义务情态及其与语气范畴(现实与非现实)的关系。数据收集自两份关于道义和文本的问卷。对于数据的分析,我们使用了Feldman (1986), Hacquard(2006, 2010)的作品作为情绪和情态的理论框架;Mithun(1995,1999)和Palmer(2001)。首先,我们展示了现实/非现实情绪标记是如何在Paresi中发生的。在序列中,我们将Paresi描述为一种在词汇上标记情态类型而不是情态力的语言。我们提出了这种语言中义务情态的两个标记:maika和wa(iye)hena,它们既表示必要性,也表示可能性。这些标记具有粒子性质,在句子结构中占据较高的位置。最后,我们描述了必要性的道义情态,表明在属然中有两种类型的义务:一种由maika助词表示;另一个是粒子wa(iye)hena。第一个人物,最好是在参与者对事件的实现负有直接责任,并且似乎与现实情绪有关的背景下。另一方面,wa(iye)hena是在法律和一般规则的背景下使用的,这些法律和一般规则描述了事务的状态应该如何,并且主要与非现实标记共同出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信