Forest Economies: A Remedy to Amazonian Deforestation?

J. Coello
{"title":"Forest Economies: A Remedy to Amazonian Deforestation?","authors":"J. Coello","doi":"10.14434/IUJUR.V2I1.20929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Commonly described as the “lungs of the planet,” the Amazon rainforest represents over half of the remaining rainforest in the world, constituting an important global carbon sink and one of the most culturally- and biologically-diverse regions of the world. The past half-century has seen a worrisome amount of deforestation in this rainforest, but different regions within the Amazon, however, compare differently in terms of deforestation trajectories. What has been the role of products obtained from managing forests, such as the now globally-consumed acai palm fruit, in reverting deforestation trends? My hypothesis is that there is a statistically significant negative correlation between such forest products and extent of deforestation. This study examines, within the historical and social context of the Amazon Delta and Estuary, the relationship between acai agroforestry and deforestation. The focus units are the municipios (roughly equivalent to counties) that constitute the Amazon Delta and Estuary, all located in the northern Brazilian states of Amapa and Para. Statistical data for deforestation obtained from PRODES, a Brazilian governmental project, which monitors deforestation via satellite, is used to ascertain deforestation in the region. This dataset is then correlated with census-based production data for each municipio for the period from 2002 to 2012. Mapping these variables onto municipios does visually demonstrate a contrast between areas of high deforestation and high acai production; however, the relationship is not statistically significant.","PeriodicalId":22986,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Undergraduate Research","volume":"52 1","pages":"63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Undergraduate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14434/IUJUR.V2I1.20929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Commonly described as the “lungs of the planet,” the Amazon rainforest represents over half of the remaining rainforest in the world, constituting an important global carbon sink and one of the most culturally- and biologically-diverse regions of the world. The past half-century has seen a worrisome amount of deforestation in this rainforest, but different regions within the Amazon, however, compare differently in terms of deforestation trajectories. What has been the role of products obtained from managing forests, such as the now globally-consumed acai palm fruit, in reverting deforestation trends? My hypothesis is that there is a statistically significant negative correlation between such forest products and extent of deforestation. This study examines, within the historical and social context of the Amazon Delta and Estuary, the relationship between acai agroforestry and deforestation. The focus units are the municipios (roughly equivalent to counties) that constitute the Amazon Delta and Estuary, all located in the northern Brazilian states of Amapa and Para. Statistical data for deforestation obtained from PRODES, a Brazilian governmental project, which monitors deforestation via satellite, is used to ascertain deforestation in the region. This dataset is then correlated with census-based production data for each municipio for the period from 2002 to 2012. Mapping these variables onto municipios does visually demonstrate a contrast between areas of high deforestation and high acai production; however, the relationship is not statistically significant.
森林经济:亚马逊森林砍伐的补救措施?
亚马逊雨林通常被称为“地球之肺”,占世界上剩余雨林的一半以上,构成了重要的全球碳汇,也是世界上文化和生物多样性最丰富的地区之一。在过去的半个世纪里,这片雨林的森林砍伐数量令人担忧,但亚马逊地区的不同地区,在森林砍伐轨迹方面进行了不同的比较。从森林管理中获得的产品,如现在全球消费的巴西莓棕榈果实,在扭转森林砍伐趋势方面发挥了什么作用?我的假设是,这些森林产品与森林砍伐程度之间存在统计学上显著的负相关关系。本研究考察了亚马逊三角洲和河口的历史和社会背景下,巴西莓农林业和森林砍伐之间的关系。重点单位是组成亚马逊三角洲和河口的市(大致相当于县),它们都位于巴西北部的阿马帕州和帕拉州。从通过卫星监测森林砍伐的巴西政府项目PRODES获得的森林砍伐统计数据被用来确定该地区的森林砍伐情况。然后将该数据集与2002年至2012年期间每个城市的基于人口普查的生产数据相关联。将这些变量映射到城市,确实从视觉上显示了高森林砍伐地区和高巴西莓产量地区之间的对比;然而,这种关系在统计上并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信