How much is too much? Effect of volume on water-swallowing test

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Thejaswi Dodderi, Mousira Puthiry, S. Thomas
{"title":"How much is too much? Effect of volume on water-swallowing test","authors":"Thejaswi Dodderi, Mousira Puthiry, S. Thomas","doi":"10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_63_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Water-swallowing test (WST) is a simple, economical bedside screening test practiced for early identification of risk for dysphagia (or swallowing impairment). However, there is no consensus on the right test quantity to assess swallowing ability by WST. Aim of the Study: The aim of the present study was to establish the right quantity of water for WST sufficient to assess sequential swallowing in healthy adults albeit avoiding larger quantity of thin liquids. Subjects and Methods: Thirty healthy young adults (HYA) (20–40 years) and thirty healthy middle-aged adults (HMA) (41–60 years) were enrolled by nonrandom convenient sampling. Four quantities (50, 90, 100, and 150 ml) of room temperature water was gauzed by a measuring cup and randomly presented to the participants to swallow in their natural pace. As per the test standard, volume/swallow (V/S), time/swallow (T/S), and swallow capacity (SC) indices were derived and subjected to further statistical analysis. Results: The results of the study suggested statistically significant increased V/S and SC in a lesser T/S among HYA compared to HMA, and the difference was at P < 0.05. The results also revealed 150 and 50 ml to have statistically significant highest and lowest SC, respectively, at P < 0.05. Pearson's correlation index suggested a positive correlation across swallowing indices between the four test volumes of water. Conclusion: The state of evidence suggests better swallowing performance in HYA, and also, there exists a direct relationship between the quantity of water and indices of WST. The advisory is to use the least of the four test quantity of thin liquids for the WST.","PeriodicalId":16373,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine","volume":"59 1","pages":"169 - 175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_63_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Water-swallowing test (WST) is a simple, economical bedside screening test practiced for early identification of risk for dysphagia (or swallowing impairment). However, there is no consensus on the right test quantity to assess swallowing ability by WST. Aim of the Study: The aim of the present study was to establish the right quantity of water for WST sufficient to assess sequential swallowing in healthy adults albeit avoiding larger quantity of thin liquids. Subjects and Methods: Thirty healthy young adults (HYA) (20–40 years) and thirty healthy middle-aged adults (HMA) (41–60 years) were enrolled by nonrandom convenient sampling. Four quantities (50, 90, 100, and 150 ml) of room temperature water was gauzed by a measuring cup and randomly presented to the participants to swallow in their natural pace. As per the test standard, volume/swallow (V/S), time/swallow (T/S), and swallow capacity (SC) indices were derived and subjected to further statistical analysis. Results: The results of the study suggested statistically significant increased V/S and SC in a lesser T/S among HYA compared to HMA, and the difference was at P < 0.05. The results also revealed 150 and 50 ml to have statistically significant highest and lowest SC, respectively, at P < 0.05. Pearson's correlation index suggested a positive correlation across swallowing indices between the four test volumes of water. Conclusion: The state of evidence suggests better swallowing performance in HYA, and also, there exists a direct relationship between the quantity of water and indices of WST. The advisory is to use the least of the four test quantity of thin liquids for the WST.
多少才算太多?体积对吞水试验的影响
简介:吞水试验(WST)是一种简单、经济的床边筛查试验,用于早期识别吞咽困难(或吞咽障碍)的风险。然而,对于用WST评估吞咽能力的正确试验量,目前尚无共识。研究目的:本研究的目的是在避免大量稀液体的情况下,确定适当的WST饮水量,以评估健康成人的顺序吞咽。对象与方法:采用非随机方便抽样方法,选取健康青壮年(HYA) 30例(20 ~ 40岁)和健康中年人(HMA) 30例(41 ~ 60岁)。四种量(50,90,100和150毫升)的室温水被一个量杯罩住,并随机呈现给参与者以自然的速度吞咽。根据试验标准,推导出体积/吞咽(V/S)、时间/吞咽(T/S)和吞咽能力(SC)指标,并进行进一步统计分析。结果:本研究结果显示,在T/S较低的情况下,HYA组V/S和SC较HMA组升高,差异有统计学意义,P < 0.05。150 ml和50 ml的SC最高和最低也有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。皮尔逊相关指数表明,四种测试水体积之间的吞咽指数呈正相关。结论:有证据表明HYA患者的吞咽性能较好,且饮水量与WST指标之间存在直接关系。建议使用四个测试量中最少的稀液体用于WST。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine
Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信