Impact of Virtual Interviewing on Time and Financial Costs for NRMP© Applicants: Did Regional Campus Students Save More?
Tiffany Schwasinger-Schmidt, Tessa Rohrberg, Anne Walling, Kari Nilsen
{"title":"Impact of Virtual Interviewing on Time and Financial Costs for NRMP© Applicants: Did Regional Campus Students Save More?","authors":"Tiffany Schwasinger-Schmidt, Tessa Rohrberg, Anne Walling, Kari Nilsen","doi":"10.24926/jrmc.v4i4.3925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: The sudden change from in-person to remote interviews by the National Residency Matching Program© (NRMP©) in 2020 was expected to result in significant financial and time savings for applicants. This project aimed to compare savings before and after the 2020-2021 interviewing season reported by students graduating from our institution’s regional and main campuses.\nMethods: Data were collected over a six-year period at a Midwestern medical school. Each year, approximately 120 main campus and 75 regional campus students are surveyed regarding specialty choice, number of applications and interviews, time, and expenses to complete the NRMP. Chi-square and t-tests were used to determine statistical differences by campus and by specialty in savings during the 2020-21 interviewing season compared to the previous five years.\nResults: Data were provided by 957 students. The response rates were 81.5% (regional) and 82% (main campus). Compared to the previous five years, in 2021 main campus students saved $3,990 (79.9%) and regional campus students saved $2,789 (77.1%). The previous highly significant differences in expenses between campuses ($1,386 ± $243) dropped to $185 (p = 0.3). On both campuses, applicants to non-primary care specialties saved more than their classmates applying to primary care. The largest average saving was reported by non-primary care applicants on the main campus ($4,207) and the smallest by regional applicants to primary care ($2,328). Main campus applicants reported saving 13.1 and regional campus 15.4 days interviewing in 2021. The smallest average time saving was reported by main campus applicants to non-primary care (12.7 days) and the largest (16.2 days) by regional campus applicants to primary care. No significant changes occurred in number of applications, interviews, or Match outcomes in 2021 compared to previous years.\nConclusion: Prior to 2021, students from our institution’s regional campus reported lower costs and similar interviewing time than their peers on the main campus. Cost and time were significantly decreased in 2021 for both regional and main campus students applying to any specialty and differences between campuses reduced to non-significant levels. The number of applications, completed interviews, and Match outcomes remained similar to previous years. Changes to the NRMP© incorporating remote interviewing may reduce applicant costs by 80% and provide up to two weeks of available curricular time in the senior year of medical school.","PeriodicalId":92811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of regional medical campuses","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of regional medical campuses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/jrmc.v4i4.3925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The sudden change from in-person to remote interviews by the National Residency Matching Program© (NRMP©) in 2020 was expected to result in significant financial and time savings for applicants. This project aimed to compare savings before and after the 2020-2021 interviewing season reported by students graduating from our institution’s regional and main campuses.
Methods: Data were collected over a six-year period at a Midwestern medical school. Each year, approximately 120 main campus and 75 regional campus students are surveyed regarding specialty choice, number of applications and interviews, time, and expenses to complete the NRMP. Chi-square and t-tests were used to determine statistical differences by campus and by specialty in savings during the 2020-21 interviewing season compared to the previous five years.
Results: Data were provided by 957 students. The response rates were 81.5% (regional) and 82% (main campus). Compared to the previous five years, in 2021 main campus students saved $3,990 (79.9%) and regional campus students saved $2,789 (77.1%). The previous highly significant differences in expenses between campuses ($1,386 ± $243) dropped to $185 (p = 0.3). On both campuses, applicants to non-primary care specialties saved more than their classmates applying to primary care. The largest average saving was reported by non-primary care applicants on the main campus ($4,207) and the smallest by regional applicants to primary care ($2,328). Main campus applicants reported saving 13.1 and regional campus 15.4 days interviewing in 2021. The smallest average time saving was reported by main campus applicants to non-primary care (12.7 days) and the largest (16.2 days) by regional campus applicants to primary care. No significant changes occurred in number of applications, interviews, or Match outcomes in 2021 compared to previous years.
Conclusion: Prior to 2021, students from our institution’s regional campus reported lower costs and similar interviewing time than their peers on the main campus. Cost and time were significantly decreased in 2021 for both regional and main campus students applying to any specialty and differences between campuses reduced to non-significant levels. The number of applications, completed interviews, and Match outcomes remained similar to previous years. Changes to the NRMP© incorporating remote interviewing may reduce applicant costs by 80% and provide up to two weeks of available curricular time in the senior year of medical school.
虚拟面试对NRMP时间和财务成本的影响©申请人:地区校园学生节省更多吗?
背景和目的:2020年,国家居留匹配计划(NRMP)将突然从面对面面试转变为远程面试,预计将为申请人节省大量的资金和时间。本项目旨在比较从我校区域校区和主校区毕业的学生报告的2020-2021年面试季节前后的储蓄。方法:在中西部一所医学院收集了六年多的数据。每年,大约120个主校区和75个地区校区的学生接受关于专业选择、申请和面试数量、完成NRMP的时间和费用的调查。卡方检验和t检验用于确定2020-21年面试季节与前五年相比,不同校园和专业在储蓄方面的统计差异。结果:957名学生提供数据。回复率分别为81.5%(区域)和82%(主校区)。与前五年相比,主校区学生在2021年节省了3,990美元(79.9%),区域校区学生节省了2,789美元(77.1%)。不同学校之间的费用差异之前非常显著(1386美元±243美元),现在下降到185美元(p = 0.3)。在这两所大学,申请非初级保健专业的学生比申请初级保健专业的学生节省的钱更多。据报告,主校区的非初级保健申请人平均节省最多(4,207美元),区域初级保健申请人平均节省最少(2,328美元)。主校区申请者报告称,在2021年节省了13.1天和区域校区15.4天的面试时间。主校区申请人在非初级保健方面平均节省的时间最少(12.7天),而区域校区申请人在初级保健方面节省的时间最多(16.2天)。与前几年相比,2021年的申请数量、面试数量或匹配结果没有显著变化。结论:在2021年之前,与主校区的学生相比,我们机构区域校区的学生报告的成本更低,面试时间相似。在2021年,区域和主校区学生申请任何专业的成本和时间都显著减少,校区之间的差异减少到不显著的水平。申请人数、完成面试的人数和比赛结果与往年相似。NRMP©的变化,包括远程面试,可以减少80%的申请人成本,并在医学院的高年级提供长达两周的可用课程时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。