Neutrophil‐to‐Lymphocyte Ratios in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The PARTNER Trials and Registries

B. Shahim, B. Redfors, B. Lindman, Shmuel Chen, T. Dahlén, Tamim Nazif, S. Kapadia, Z. Gertz, Aaron Crowley, Ditian Li, V. Thourani, S. Kodali, A. Zajarías, V. Babaliaros, R. Guyton, S. Elmariah, H. Herrmann, D. Cohen, M. Mack, Craig R. Smith, M. Leon, I. George
{"title":"Neutrophil‐to‐Lymphocyte Ratios in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The PARTNER Trials and Registries","authors":"B. Shahim, B. Redfors, B. Lindman, Shmuel Chen, T. Dahlén, Tamim Nazif, S. Kapadia, Z. Gertz, Aaron Crowley, Ditian Li, V. Thourani, S. Kodali, A. Zajarías, V. Babaliaros, R. Guyton, S. Elmariah, H. Herrmann, D. Cohen, M. Mack, Craig R. Smith, M. Leon, I. George","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.121.024091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a marker of systemic inflammation has been associated with worse prognosis in several chronic disease states, including heart failure. However, few data exist on the prognostic impact of elevated baseline NLR or change in NLR levels during follow‐up in patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVR or SAVR) for aortic stenosis. Methods and Results NLR was available in 5881 patients with severe aortic stenosis receiving TAVR or SAVR in PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) I, II, and S3 trials/registries (median [Q1, Q3] NLR, 3.30 [2.40, 4.90]); mean NLR, 4.10; range, 0.5–24.9) and was evaluated as continuous variable and categorical tertiles (low: NLR ≤2.70, n=1963; intermediate: NLR 2.70–4.20, n=1958; high: NLR ≥4.20, n=1960). No patients had known baseline infection. High baseline NLR was associated with increased risk of death or rehospitalization at 3 years (58.4% versus 41.0%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.18–1.63; P<0.0001) compared with those with low NLR, irrespective of treatment modality. In both patients treated with TAVR and patients treated with SAVR, NLR decreased between baseline and 2 years. A 1‐unit observed decrease in NLR between baseline and 1 year was associated with lower risk of death or rehospitalization between 1 year and 3 years (aHR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82–0.89; P<0.0001). Conclusions Elevated baseline NLR was independently associated with increased subsequent mortality and rehospitalization after TAVR or SAVR. The observed decrease in NLR after TAVR or SAVR was associated with improved outcomes. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00530894, NCT0134313, NCT02184442, NCT03225001, NCT0322141.","PeriodicalId":17189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background The neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a marker of systemic inflammation has been associated with worse prognosis in several chronic disease states, including heart failure. However, few data exist on the prognostic impact of elevated baseline NLR or change in NLR levels during follow‐up in patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVR or SAVR) for aortic stenosis. Methods and Results NLR was available in 5881 patients with severe aortic stenosis receiving TAVR or SAVR in PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) I, II, and S3 trials/registries (median [Q1, Q3] NLR, 3.30 [2.40, 4.90]); mean NLR, 4.10; range, 0.5–24.9) and was evaluated as continuous variable and categorical tertiles (low: NLR ≤2.70, n=1963; intermediate: NLR 2.70–4.20, n=1958; high: NLR ≥4.20, n=1960). No patients had known baseline infection. High baseline NLR was associated with increased risk of death or rehospitalization at 3 years (58.4% versus 41.0%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.18–1.63; P<0.0001) compared with those with low NLR, irrespective of treatment modality. In both patients treated with TAVR and patients treated with SAVR, NLR decreased between baseline and 2 years. A 1‐unit observed decrease in NLR between baseline and 1 year was associated with lower risk of death or rehospitalization between 1 year and 3 years (aHR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82–0.89; P<0.0001). Conclusions Elevated baseline NLR was independently associated with increased subsequent mortality and rehospitalization after TAVR or SAVR. The observed decrease in NLR after TAVR or SAVR was associated with improved outcomes. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00530894, NCT0134313, NCT02184442, NCT03225001, NCT0322141.
主动脉瓣置换术患者中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率:PARTNER试验和登记
研究背景中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)作为全身性炎症的标志物,与包括心力衰竭在内的多种慢性疾病的不良预后相关。然而,在接受经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR或SAVR)治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的患者随访期间,基线NLR升高或NLR水平变化对预后的影响的数据很少。方法和结果5881例在PARTNER(经主动脉瓣置入术)I、II和S3试验/注册中接受TAVR或SAVR的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者可获得NLR(中位NLR [Q1, Q3], 3.30 [2.40, 4.90]);平均NLR为4.10;范围0.5-24.9),并被评价为连续变量和分类三分之一(低:NLR≤2.70,n=1963;中间:NLR 2.70-4.20, n=1958;高:NLR≥4.20,n=1960)。没有患者有已知的基线感染。高基线NLR与3年死亡或再住院风险增加相关(58.4%对41.0%;校正风险比[aHR], 1.39;95% ci, 1.18-1.63;P<0.0001),与低NLR患者相比,无论治疗方式如何。在接受TAVR治疗的患者和接受SAVR治疗的患者中,NLR在基线和2年之间下降。基线和1年之间NLR降低1个单位与1年和3年之间死亡或再住院风险降低相关(aHR, 0.86;95% ci, 0.82-0.89;P < 0.0001)。结论:基线NLR升高与TAVR或SAVR术后死亡率和再住院率升高独立相关。观察到的TAVR或SAVR术后NLR的减少与预后的改善有关。注册网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT00530894, NCT0134313, NCT02184442, NCT03225001, NCT0322141。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信