Validation of a Model for Estimating Individual External Dose Based on Ambient Dose Equivalent and Life Patterns

IF 0.6 Q4 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
R. Sato, K. Yoshimura, Y. Sanada, Tetsuro Sato
{"title":"Validation of a Model for Estimating Individual External Dose Based on Ambient Dose Equivalent and Life Patterns","authors":"R. Sato, K. Yoshimura, Y. Sanada, Tetsuro Sato","doi":"10.14407/jrpr.2021.00290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: After the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (FDNPS) accident, a model was developed to estimate the external exposure doses for residents who were expected to return to their homes after evacuation orders were lifted. However, the model’s accuracy and uncer-tainties in parameters used to estimate external doses have not been evaluated. Materials and Methods: The model estimates effective doses based on the integrated ambient dose equivalent ( H * (10)) and life patterns, considering a dose reduction factor to estimate the indoor H * (10) and a conversion factor from H * (10) to the effective dose. Because personal dose equivalent ( H p (10)) has been reported to agree well with the effective dose after the FDNPS accident, this study validates the model’s accuracy by comparing the estimated effective doses with H p (10). The H p (10) and life pattern data were collected for 36 adult participants who lived or worked near the FDNPS in 2019. Results and Discussion: The estimated effective doses correlated significantly with H p (10); however, the estimated effective doses were lower than H p (10) for indoor sites. A comparison with the measured indoor H * (10) showed that the estimated indoor H * (10) was not underesti-mated. However, the H p (10) to H * (10) ratio indoors, which corresponds to the practical conversion factor from H * (10) to the effective dose, was significantly larger than the same ratio outdoors, meaning that the conversion factor of 0.6 is not appropriate for indoors due to the changes in irradiation geometry and gamma spectra. This could have led to a lower effective dose than H p (10). Conclusion: The estimated effective doses correlated significantly with H p (10), demonstrating the model’s applicability for effective dose estimation. However, the lower value of the effective dose indoors could be because the conversion factor did not reflect the actual environment.","PeriodicalId":36088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Protection and Research","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Protection and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14407/jrpr.2021.00290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: After the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (FDNPS) accident, a model was developed to estimate the external exposure doses for residents who were expected to return to their homes after evacuation orders were lifted. However, the model’s accuracy and uncer-tainties in parameters used to estimate external doses have not been evaluated. Materials and Methods: The model estimates effective doses based on the integrated ambient dose equivalent ( H * (10)) and life patterns, considering a dose reduction factor to estimate the indoor H * (10) and a conversion factor from H * (10) to the effective dose. Because personal dose equivalent ( H p (10)) has been reported to agree well with the effective dose after the FDNPS accident, this study validates the model’s accuracy by comparing the estimated effective doses with H p (10). The H p (10) and life pattern data were collected for 36 adult participants who lived or worked near the FDNPS in 2019. Results and Discussion: The estimated effective doses correlated significantly with H p (10); however, the estimated effective doses were lower than H p (10) for indoor sites. A comparison with the measured indoor H * (10) showed that the estimated indoor H * (10) was not underesti-mated. However, the H p (10) to H * (10) ratio indoors, which corresponds to the practical conversion factor from H * (10) to the effective dose, was significantly larger than the same ratio outdoors, meaning that the conversion factor of 0.6 is not appropriate for indoors due to the changes in irradiation geometry and gamma spectra. This could have led to a lower effective dose than H p (10). Conclusion: The estimated effective doses correlated significantly with H p (10), demonstrating the model’s applicability for effective dose estimation. However, the lower value of the effective dose indoors could be because the conversion factor did not reflect the actual environment.
基于环境剂量当量和生活模式估计个人外剂量的模型的验证
背景:在福岛第一核电站(FDNPS)事故发生后,建立了一个模型来估计疏散命令解除后预计返回家园的居民的外照射剂量。然而,该模型的准确性和用于估计外部剂量的参数的不确定性尚未得到评估。材料和方法:该模型根据综合环境剂量当量(H *(10))和生活模式估算有效剂量,同时考虑估算室内H *(10)的剂量减少因子和从H *(10)到有效剂量的转换因子。由于已报道的个人剂量当量(hp(10))与FDNPS事故后的有效剂量吻合良好,因此本研究通过比较估计的有效剂量与hp(10)来验证模型的准确性。2019年,研究人员收集了36名在FDNPS附近生活或工作的成年参与者的血压(10)和生活模式数据。结果与讨论:估计有效剂量与hp显著相关(10);然而,室内场所的估计有效剂量低于hp(10)。通过与室内实测H *(10)的比较表明,室内H *(10)的估计值没有被低估。然而,室内hp(10)与H *(10)之比(对应于H *(10)与有效剂量的实际换算系数)明显大于室外相同的比值,这意味着由于辐照几何形状和γ谱的变化,0.6的换算系数不适用于室内。这可能导致比hp(10)更低的有效剂量。结论:估算的有效剂量与hp(10)显著相关,表明该模型适用于估算有效剂量。然而,室内有效剂量值较低可能是因为换算因子没有反映实际环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
Journal of Radiation Protection and Research Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信