Putting Religious Bias in Context: How Offline and Online Contexts Shape Religious Bias in Online Prosocial Lending

MIS Q. Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.25300/misq/2022/16959
Amin Sabzehzar, Gordon Burtch, Y. Hong, T. Raghu
{"title":"Putting Religious Bias in Context: How Offline and Online Contexts Shape Religious Bias in Online Prosocial Lending","authors":"Amin Sabzehzar, Gordon Burtch, Y. Hong, T. Raghu","doi":"10.25300/misq/2022/16959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biases on online platforms pose a threat to social inclusion. We examine the influence of a novel source of bias in online philanthropic lending, namely that associated with religious differences. We first propose religion distance as a probabilistic measure of differences between pairs of individuals residing in different countries. We then incorporate this measure into a gravity model of trade to explain variation in country-to-country lending volumes. We further propose a set of contextual moderators that characterize individuals’ offline (local) and online social contexts, which we argue combine to determine the influence of religion distance on lending activity. We empirically estimate our gravity model using data from Kiva.org, reflecting all lending actions that took place between 2006 and 2017. We demonstrate the negative and significant effect of religion distance on lending activity, over and above other established factors in the literature. Further, we demonstrate the moderating role of lenders’ offline social context (diversity, social hostilities, and governmental favoritism of religion) on the aforementioned relationship to online lending behavior. Finally, we offer empirical evidence of the parallel role of online contextual factors, namely those related to community features offered by the Kiva platform (lending teams), which appear to amplify the role of religious bias. In particular, we show that religious team membership is a double-edged sword that has both favorable and unfavorable consequences, increasing lending in general but skewing said lending toward religiously similar borrowers. Our findings speak to the important frictions associated with religious differences in individual philanthropy; they point to the role of governmental policy vis-à-vis religious tolerance as a determinant of citizens’ global philanthropic behavior, and they highlight design implications for online platforms with an eye toward managing religious bias.","PeriodicalId":18743,"journal":{"name":"MIS Q.","volume":"10 1","pages":"33-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MIS Q.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2022/16959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biases on online platforms pose a threat to social inclusion. We examine the influence of a novel source of bias in online philanthropic lending, namely that associated with religious differences. We first propose religion distance as a probabilistic measure of differences between pairs of individuals residing in different countries. We then incorporate this measure into a gravity model of trade to explain variation in country-to-country lending volumes. We further propose a set of contextual moderators that characterize individuals’ offline (local) and online social contexts, which we argue combine to determine the influence of religion distance on lending activity. We empirically estimate our gravity model using data from Kiva.org, reflecting all lending actions that took place between 2006 and 2017. We demonstrate the negative and significant effect of religion distance on lending activity, over and above other established factors in the literature. Further, we demonstrate the moderating role of lenders’ offline social context (diversity, social hostilities, and governmental favoritism of religion) on the aforementioned relationship to online lending behavior. Finally, we offer empirical evidence of the parallel role of online contextual factors, namely those related to community features offered by the Kiva platform (lending teams), which appear to amplify the role of religious bias. In particular, we show that religious team membership is a double-edged sword that has both favorable and unfavorable consequences, increasing lending in general but skewing said lending toward religiously similar borrowers. Our findings speak to the important frictions associated with religious differences in individual philanthropy; they point to the role of governmental policy vis-à-vis religious tolerance as a determinant of citizens’ global philanthropic behavior, and they highlight design implications for online platforms with an eye toward managing religious bias.
将宗教偏见放在语境中:离线和在线语境如何在在线亲社会借贷中塑造宗教偏见
网络平台上的偏见对社会包容构成威胁。我们研究了一种新的偏见来源对在线慈善贷款的影响,即与宗教差异相关的偏见。我们首先提出宗教距离作为居住在不同国家的个人对之间差异的概率度量。然后,我们将这一措施纳入贸易引力模型,以解释国与国之间贷款额的差异。我们进一步提出了一组描述个人离线(本地)和在线社会背景的语境调节因子,我们认为这些因素结合起来决定了宗教距离对借贷活动的影响。我们使用Kiva.org的数据对重力模型进行了实证估计,该模型反映了2006年至2017年间发生的所有贷款行为。我们证明了宗教距离对借贷活动的负面和显著影响,超过了文献中其他既定因素。此外,我们还证明了贷款人的线下社会背景(多样性、社会敌意和政府对宗教的偏爱)对上述关系与在线借贷行为的调节作用。最后,我们提供了在线背景因素平行作用的经验证据,即那些与Kiva平台(借贷团队)提供的社区功能相关的因素,这些因素似乎放大了宗教偏见的作用。特别是,我们表明,宗教团队成员是一把双刃剑,既有有利的后果,也有不利的后果,一方面增加了放贷,另一方面也使放贷偏向于宗教信仰相似的借款人。我们的发现说明了个人慈善中与宗教差异相关的重要摩擦;他们指出,政府政策对-à-vis宗教宽容的作用是公民全球慈善行为的决定因素,他们强调了在线平台设计对管理宗教偏见的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信