Bringing Them In or Pushing Them Out? The Labor Market Effects of Pro-cyclical Unemployment Assistance Reductions

Gerard Domènech-Arumí, Silvia Vannutelli
{"title":"Bringing Them In or Pushing Them Out? The Labor Market Effects of Pro-cyclical Unemployment Assistance Reductions","authors":"Gerard Domènech-Arumí, Silvia Vannutelli","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3854130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We exploit variation from an unanticipated labor market reform in 2012 Spain to causally estimate the effects of pro-cyclical unemployment assistance (UA) reductions on job search behavior and re-employment outcomes. Shorter benefit durations effectively bring individuals back to work and reduce non-employment duration. However, they also induce displacements out of the labor force and strong substitution patterns towards other, less generous, welfare programs, highlighting the social insurance role of long-term benefits during economic downturns. Despite the sharp drop in non-employment duration, we also document a significant decrease in re-employment wages, consistent with reduced workers' reservation wages and limited duration dependence. Heterogeneity analyses show that relatively younger workers are the ones that are brought back into re-employment in lower-quality jobs, while older workers are pushed out of the labor force. Looking at responses over the non-employment spell, we provide evidence against the standard assumption of forward-looking behavior of benefit recipients, as we do not detect any change in workers' behavior before benefit exhaustion. Overall, we estimate that the reform induced only moderate fiscal savings for the government.","PeriodicalId":10619,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Political Economy: Social Welfare Policy eJournal","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Political Economy: Social Welfare Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3854130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We exploit variation from an unanticipated labor market reform in 2012 Spain to causally estimate the effects of pro-cyclical unemployment assistance (UA) reductions on job search behavior and re-employment outcomes. Shorter benefit durations effectively bring individuals back to work and reduce non-employment duration. However, they also induce displacements out of the labor force and strong substitution patterns towards other, less generous, welfare programs, highlighting the social insurance role of long-term benefits during economic downturns. Despite the sharp drop in non-employment duration, we also document a significant decrease in re-employment wages, consistent with reduced workers' reservation wages and limited duration dependence. Heterogeneity analyses show that relatively younger workers are the ones that are brought back into re-employment in lower-quality jobs, while older workers are pushed out of the labor force. Looking at responses over the non-employment spell, we provide evidence against the standard assumption of forward-looking behavior of benefit recipients, as we do not detect any change in workers' behavior before benefit exhaustion. Overall, we estimate that the reform induced only moderate fiscal savings for the government.
让他们进来还是把他们赶出去?顺周期失业援助减少对劳动力市场的影响
我们利用2012年西班牙出人意料的劳动力市场改革的变化来因果估计顺周期失业援助(UA)减少对求职行为和再就业结果的影响。较短的福利期限有效地使个人重返工作岗位并减少失业时间。然而,它们也会导致劳动力的流离失所和对其他不那么慷慨的福利计划的强烈替代模式,突出了经济衰退期间长期福利的社会保险作用。尽管非就业持续时间急剧下降,但我们也记录了再就业工资的显著下降,这与工人保留工资的减少和有限的持续时间依赖一致。异质性分析显示,相对年轻的工人被重新带回低质量的工作岗位,而年龄较大的工人则被挤出劳动力市场。通过观察失业期间的反应,我们提供了反对福利接受者前瞻性行为的标准假设的证据,因为我们没有发现在福利耗尽之前工人的行为有任何变化。总的来说,我们估计改革只给政府带来了适度的财政储蓄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信