Spenser’s Petrarch

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Spenser Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1086/706602
Ayesha Ramachandran
{"title":"Spenser’s Petrarch","authors":"Ayesha Ramachandran","doi":"10.1086/706602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay calls for a fresh look at Spenser’s relationship to Petrarch—one that moves past a reliance on commonplace notions of “Petrarchism” to consider what exactly the English poet may have learned from his Italian predecessor. It thus explores what it might mean to identify Spenser as “post-Petrarchan”: to love and rival Vergil, to engage in intense literary self-reflection and autobiographical self-presentation, to reach for an international, multilingual audience engaged in cross-cultural and transhistorical dialogue, and to transform the lyric from a relatively minor literary genre to one that sought epic amplitude.","PeriodicalId":39606,"journal":{"name":"Spenser Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spenser Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/706602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay calls for a fresh look at Spenser’s relationship to Petrarch—one that moves past a reliance on commonplace notions of “Petrarchism” to consider what exactly the English poet may have learned from his Italian predecessor. It thus explores what it might mean to identify Spenser as “post-Petrarchan”: to love and rival Vergil, to engage in intense literary self-reflection and autobiographical self-presentation, to reach for an international, multilingual audience engaged in cross-cultural and transhistorical dialogue, and to transform the lyric from a relatively minor literary genre to one that sought epic amplitude.
这篇文章要求我们重新审视斯宾塞与彼特拉克的关系——不再依赖于“彼特拉克主义”这一老生常谈的概念,转而思考这位英国诗人究竟从他的意大利前辈那里学到了什么。因此,本文探讨了将斯宾塞定义为“后彼特拉克”可能意味着什么:热爱并与维吉尔竞争,从事激烈的文学自我反思和自传式自我呈现,接触国际、多语言的受众,参与跨文化和跨历史的对话,并将抒情从相对次要的文学类型转变为寻求史诗般的幅度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spenser Studies
Spenser Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信