Evaluation of Salivary Lactate Dehydrogenase Level as a Biomarker for Early Detection in Oral Cancer and Potentially Malignant Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Arunima Sarma, Sunil S Mishra, Sukanya Das, Harshawardhan Sawane, T. Gaikwad
{"title":"Evaluation of Salivary Lactate Dehydrogenase Level as a Biomarker for Early Detection in Oral Cancer and Potentially Malignant Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Arunima Sarma, Sunil S Mishra, Sukanya Das, Harshawardhan Sawane, T. Gaikwad","doi":"10.7860/jcdr/2023/60586.18162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Saliva diagnostics are emerging tools which are being explored as a non invasive method for early detection of oral premalignant lesions and Oral Cancer (OC). Salivary Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) is one such promising biomarker which has shown potential to be utilised in future for detection of premalignant lesions and conditions. The rationale behind this systematic review was to evaluate whether salivary LDH can be considered as biomarker for OC and Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMDs). Aim: To review the literature for levels of salivary LDH in patients with OC and OPMD. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search was done and this systematic review was conducted in the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Dr. DY Patil Dental College and Hospital, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India, following (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) PRISMA guidelines. The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration Identity Document (ID) was (CRD42022366117). Electronic data was searched through the database PubMed, ScienceDirect and Cochrane Library from 2012-2022. Observational and analytical studies, original longitudinal or case-control, randomised clinical trials, prospective controlled clinical trials with the inclusion of cases diagnosed with oral leukoplakia, Oral Lichen Planus (OLP), Oral Submucous Fibrosis (OSMF), OC and having salivary LDH levels reported were included. The data was collected from the studies that were included based on study design, eligibility criteria, histological differentiation, collection method, LDH level and the data were subjected to meta-analysis. Results: A total of 16 articles were included. The meta-analysis showed increased salivary LDH levels between cases with OC and Control Group (CG). The pooled estimate was 5.71 (95% CI: 3.89-7.53) with statistical significance of <0.05. In OSMF and controls the levels of salivary LDH was significantly increased. The pooled estimate was 30.38 (95% CI: 15.82-44.94) with statistical significance of <0.05. The level of salivary LDH among cases with premalignant lesions and controls was increased. The pooled estimate was 9.10 (95% CI: 3.45-14.75) with statistical significance of <0.05. In case of OLP and controls, the levels of salivary LDH were seen elevated. The pooled estimate was 6.76 (95% CI: 6.86- 20.38) with no statistical significance of p-value<0.05. Conclusion: To sum up, the results of this systematic review showed that levels of salivary LDH were higher in OC and OPMD patients than in healthy patients. Furthermore, the levels of salivary LDH are more in OC than OPMDs.","PeriodicalId":15483,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2023/60586.18162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Saliva diagnostics are emerging tools which are being explored as a non invasive method for early detection of oral premalignant lesions and Oral Cancer (OC). Salivary Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) is one such promising biomarker which has shown potential to be utilised in future for detection of premalignant lesions and conditions. The rationale behind this systematic review was to evaluate whether salivary LDH can be considered as biomarker for OC and Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMDs). Aim: To review the literature for levels of salivary LDH in patients with OC and OPMD. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search was done and this systematic review was conducted in the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Dr. DY Patil Dental College and Hospital, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India, following (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) PRISMA guidelines. The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration Identity Document (ID) was (CRD42022366117). Electronic data was searched through the database PubMed, ScienceDirect and Cochrane Library from 2012-2022. Observational and analytical studies, original longitudinal or case-control, randomised clinical trials, prospective controlled clinical trials with the inclusion of cases diagnosed with oral leukoplakia, Oral Lichen Planus (OLP), Oral Submucous Fibrosis (OSMF), OC and having salivary LDH levels reported were included. The data was collected from the studies that were included based on study design, eligibility criteria, histological differentiation, collection method, LDH level and the data were subjected to meta-analysis. Results: A total of 16 articles were included. The meta-analysis showed increased salivary LDH levels between cases with OC and Control Group (CG). The pooled estimate was 5.71 (95% CI: 3.89-7.53) with statistical significance of <0.05. In OSMF and controls the levels of salivary LDH was significantly increased. The pooled estimate was 30.38 (95% CI: 15.82-44.94) with statistical significance of <0.05. The level of salivary LDH among cases with premalignant lesions and controls was increased. The pooled estimate was 9.10 (95% CI: 3.45-14.75) with statistical significance of <0.05. In case of OLP and controls, the levels of salivary LDH were seen elevated. The pooled estimate was 6.76 (95% CI: 6.86- 20.38) with no statistical significance of p-value<0.05. Conclusion: To sum up, the results of this systematic review showed that levels of salivary LDH were higher in OC and OPMD patients than in healthy patients. Furthermore, the levels of salivary LDH are more in OC than OPMDs.
唾液乳酸脱氢酶水平作为早期检测口腔癌和潜在恶性疾病的生物标志物的评价:系统综述和荟萃分析
唾液诊断是一种新兴的工具,正在被探索作为一种非侵入性的方法来早期检测口腔癌前病变和口腔癌(OC)。唾液乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)是一种有前途的生物标志物,已显示出在未来用于检测癌前病变和疾病的潜力。本系统综述的基本原理是评估唾液LDH是否可以被视为OC和口腔潜在恶性疾病(OPMDs)的生物标志物。目的:回顾有关OC和OPMD患者唾液LDH水平的文献。材料和方法:根据PRISMA指南(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目),在印度马哈拉施特拉邦Pune Pimpri的Dr. DY Patil牙科学院和医院口腔医学和放射科进行了全面的检索和系统评价。国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO)注册身份文件(ID)为(CRD42022366117)。通过PubMed、ScienceDirect和Cochrane Library数据库检索2012-2022年的电子数据。观察性和分析性研究,原始纵向或病例对照,随机临床试验,前瞻性对照临床试验,包括诊断为口腔白斑,口腔扁平苔藓(OLP),口腔黏膜下纤维化(OSMF), OC和唾液LDH水平报告的病例。根据研究设计、入选标准、组织学分化、收集方法、LDH水平收集纳入研究的数据,并对数据进行meta分析。结果:共纳入16篇文献。荟萃分析显示,OC组和对照组(CG)的唾液LDH水平升高。合并估计为5.71 (95% CI: 3.89 ~ 7.53),差异有统计学意义<0.05。在OSMF组和对照组中,唾液LDH水平显著升高。合并估计值为30.38 (95% CI: 15.82 ~ 44.94),差异有统计学意义<0.05。唾液LDH水平在有癌前病变的病例和对照组中升高。合并估计为9.10 (95% CI: 3.45 ~ 14.75),差异有统计学意义<0.05。在OLP和对照组的情况下,唾液LDH水平升高。合并估计为6.76 (95% CI: 6.86 ~ 20.38), p值<0.05无统计学意义。结论:综上所述,本系统综述的结果显示,OC和OPMD患者的唾液LDH水平高于健康患者。此外,OC患者的唾液LDH水平高于opmd患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
761
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Specialties Covered: Anaesthesia, Anatomy, Animal Research, Biochemistry, Biotechnology, Cardiology, Community, Dermatology, Dentistry, Education, Emergency Medicine, Endocrinology, Ethics, Ear Nose and Throat, Forensic, Gastroenterology, Genetics, Haematology, Health Management and Policy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Intensive Care, Internal Medicine, Microbiology, Health Management and Policy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Intensive Care, Internal Medicine, Microbiology, Nephrology / Renal, Neurology and Neuro-Surgery, Nutrition, Nursing/Midwifery, Oncology, Orthopaedics, Ophthalmology, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Neonatology Pharmacology, Physiology, Pathology, Plastic Surgery, Psychiatry/Mental Health, Rehabilitation / Physiotherapy, Radiology, Statistics, Surgery, Speech and Hearing (Audiology)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信