A longitudinal, randomized and controlled study of app-delivered mindfulness in the workplace

Jennifer S. Mascaro, Kathryn Wehrmeyer, V. Mahathre, Alana Darcher
{"title":"A longitudinal, randomized and controlled study of app-delivered mindfulness in the workplace","authors":"Jennifer S. Mascaro, Kathryn Wehrmeyer, V. Mahathre, Alana Darcher","doi":"10.18297/jwellness/vol2/iss1/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Workplace mindfulness meditation programs are of great interest for improving employee wellbeing and job performance, fueled in part by the apparent effectiveness of mindfulness meditation as well as by the recent proliferation of mobile mindfulness applications (apps) that can be incorporated into a workplace setting. It is critical to examine the facilitators and barriers to engaging with app-delivered mindfulness in the workplace to understand how biological, psychological, and socio-demographic variables impact practice time. Methods: Using a longitudinal and randomized controlled design, we explored facilitators of and barriers to practicing app-delivered mindfulness in the workplace among predominately non-white call center employees. Mindfulness engagement was operationalized as practice time during a prescriptive study period as well as during the entire 1-year duration of the app subscription. In addition, we made preliminary estimates of the impact of app-delivered mindfulness, compared to wait-list open relaxation, on job performance, negative symptoms, well-being, and social connectedness. Results: Employee C-reactive protein levels were positively correlated with subsequent meditation practice time. Employees who reported wanting to use the app to manage stress were most likely to use it, and women practiced significantly more than men. No other psychological resources were significantly correlated with practice time. Employees randomized to mindfulness had a significant increase in self-reported mindfulness scores, but did not have significant improvements in any other psychological or performance domains. Conclusion: Together these data expand what is known about engagement with, and impact of, mindfulness on a population that is under-represented in the research on mindfulness meditation. As mindfulness proliferates beyond the biomedical contexts and populations in which it has been traditionally popular within modern Western contexts, it is crucial to examine its acceptability and gain an understanding of the personality and demographic variables that predict engagement. While it is clear from previous research that engagement with mindfulness varies based on demographic [18, 29] and individual differences [30], a challenge of interpreting these data is understanding causal mechanisms that render meditation accessible and acceptable to some populations and not to others. This is a particularly obfuscating challenge, since previous research points to logistical or practical barriers to meditation practice, including time commitments [28], and lack of access [18]. To overcome this challenge, the current study was designed to provide 1-year subscriptions to a popular mindfulness meditation app and to reduce logistic barriers by providing employees with a break to use the app. In addition, we examined the impact of app-delivered mindfulness on both self-reported and job performance outcomes. The study had two specific aims. First, we designed the study to examine facilitators of and barriers to practicing app-delivered mindfulness in the workplace. To address this aim, we used a biopsychosocial framework toward a holistic and whole-person approach to workplace wellness and lifestyle medicine [31, 32]. We tested the hypothesis that psychological resources and sociodemographic factors would predict engagement with the app. We also tested the hypothesis that biological factors would influence app use. Specifically, we examined whether inflammatory states or self-reported sleep disturbance predicted practice time, since previous research indicates that both of these variables are likely to impact the ability to engage in an intervention [33-35]. Second, we evaluated the impact of app-delivered mindfulness, compared to waitlist open relaxation, on job functioning, daily functioning, well-being, and social connectedness.","PeriodicalId":90738,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of health, wellness & society","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of health, wellness & society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18297/jwellness/vol2/iss1/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Workplace mindfulness meditation programs are of great interest for improving employee wellbeing and job performance, fueled in part by the apparent effectiveness of mindfulness meditation as well as by the recent proliferation of mobile mindfulness applications (apps) that can be incorporated into a workplace setting. It is critical to examine the facilitators and barriers to engaging with app-delivered mindfulness in the workplace to understand how biological, psychological, and socio-demographic variables impact practice time. Methods: Using a longitudinal and randomized controlled design, we explored facilitators of and barriers to practicing app-delivered mindfulness in the workplace among predominately non-white call center employees. Mindfulness engagement was operationalized as practice time during a prescriptive study period as well as during the entire 1-year duration of the app subscription. In addition, we made preliminary estimates of the impact of app-delivered mindfulness, compared to wait-list open relaxation, on job performance, negative symptoms, well-being, and social connectedness. Results: Employee C-reactive protein levels were positively correlated with subsequent meditation practice time. Employees who reported wanting to use the app to manage stress were most likely to use it, and women practiced significantly more than men. No other psychological resources were significantly correlated with practice time. Employees randomized to mindfulness had a significant increase in self-reported mindfulness scores, but did not have significant improvements in any other psychological or performance domains. Conclusion: Together these data expand what is known about engagement with, and impact of, mindfulness on a population that is under-represented in the research on mindfulness meditation. As mindfulness proliferates beyond the biomedical contexts and populations in which it has been traditionally popular within modern Western contexts, it is crucial to examine its acceptability and gain an understanding of the personality and demographic variables that predict engagement. While it is clear from previous research that engagement with mindfulness varies based on demographic [18, 29] and individual differences [30], a challenge of interpreting these data is understanding causal mechanisms that render meditation accessible and acceptable to some populations and not to others. This is a particularly obfuscating challenge, since previous research points to logistical or practical barriers to meditation practice, including time commitments [28], and lack of access [18]. To overcome this challenge, the current study was designed to provide 1-year subscriptions to a popular mindfulness meditation app and to reduce logistic barriers by providing employees with a break to use the app. In addition, we examined the impact of app-delivered mindfulness on both self-reported and job performance outcomes. The study had two specific aims. First, we designed the study to examine facilitators of and barriers to practicing app-delivered mindfulness in the workplace. To address this aim, we used a biopsychosocial framework toward a holistic and whole-person approach to workplace wellness and lifestyle medicine [31, 32]. We tested the hypothesis that psychological resources and sociodemographic factors would predict engagement with the app. We also tested the hypothesis that biological factors would influence app use. Specifically, we examined whether inflammatory states or self-reported sleep disturbance predicted practice time, since previous research indicates that both of these variables are likely to impact the ability to engage in an intervention [33-35]. Second, we evaluated the impact of app-delivered mindfulness, compared to waitlist open relaxation, on job functioning, daily functioning, well-being, and social connectedness.
一项纵向、随机和对照研究,研究工作场所应用程序提供的正念
背景:工作场所正念冥想项目对提高员工的幸福感和工作表现非常有兴趣,部分原因是正念冥想的明显有效性,以及最近可纳入工作场所环境的移动正念应用程序(app)的激增。为了了解生物、心理和社会人口变量如何影响练习时间,研究在工作场所使用应用程序提供的正念的促进因素和障碍至关重要。方法:采用纵向和随机对照设计,我们探讨了非白人呼叫中心员工在工作场所练习应用程序交付的正念的促进因素和障碍。正念参与在规定的研究期间以及在应用程序订阅的整个1年期间作为练习时间进行操作。此外,我们对应用程序提供的正念对工作表现、负面症状、幸福感和社会联系的影响进行了初步估计,与等候名单开放放松相比。结果:员工c反应蛋白水平与随后的冥想练习时间呈正相关。那些报告说想用这款应用来管理压力的员工最有可能使用它,而且女性比男性练习得多得多。其他心理资源与练习时间无显著相关。被随机分配到正念组的员工自我报告的正念得分显著提高,但在任何其他心理或表现领域没有显著改善。结论:总的来说,这些数据扩展了人们对正念冥想研究中代表性不足的人群的参与和影响的了解。随着正念在生物医学背景和现代西方背景下传统流行的人群中扩散,检验其可接受性并获得对预测参与的个性和人口变量的理解至关重要。虽然从先前的研究中可以清楚地看出,正念的参与程度因人口统计学[18,29]和个体差异[30]而有所不同,但解释这些数据的一个挑战是理解使冥想对某些人群容易接受的因果机制,而对其他人群则不然。这是一个特别令人困惑的挑战,因为之前的研究指出了冥想练习的后勤或实际障碍,包括时间承诺[28]和缺乏机会[18]。为了克服这一挑战,目前的研究旨在为一款流行的正念冥想应用提供为期一年的订阅服务,并通过为员工提供使用该应用的休息时间来减少后勤障碍。此外,我们还研究了应用程序提供的正念对自我报告和工作绩效结果的影响。这项研究有两个具体目的。首先,我们设计了这项研究,以检查在工作场所练习应用程序交付的正念的促进因素和障碍。为了实现这一目标,我们使用了一个生物心理社会框架,对工作场所健康和生活方式医学进行了全面和全人的研究[31,32]。我们测试了心理资源和社会人口因素会预测应用的参与度的假设。我们还测试了生物因素会影响应用使用的假设。具体来说,我们研究了炎症状态或自我报告的睡眠障碍是否能预测练习时间,因为之前的研究表明,这两个变量都可能影响参与干预的能力[33-35]。其次,我们评估了应用程序提供的正念对工作功能、日常功能、幸福感和社会联系的影响,与等候名单开放放松相比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书