Housing costs for adults who are mentally ill and formerly homeless.

B Dickey, E Latimer, K Powers, O Gonzalez, S M Goldfinger
{"title":"Housing costs for adults who are mentally ill and formerly homeless.","authors":"B Dickey,&nbsp;E Latimer,&nbsp;K Powers,&nbsp;O Gonzalez,&nbsp;S M Goldfinger","doi":"10.1007/BF02832663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goal of this study was to evaluate the costs, under two different housing conditions, to the state mental health agency of caring for adults who are homeless and mentally ill. One hundred and twelve clients of the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, living in psychiatric shelters, were randomly assigned to one of two housing types: Evolving Consumer Households or Independent Living apartments. For the next 18 months each client was followed so that the cost of treatment, case management, and housing could be collected and compared. The authors found that treatment and case management costs did not vary by housing type, but housing costs were significantly higher for those assigned to Evolving Consumer Households. Regardless of original housing assignment, treatment costs were lower for clients who remained where they were originally placed. The authors conclude that providing support for clients that increases housing stability reduces their need for treatment and that independent living arrangements may be a more cost-effective policy choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73827,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mental health administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02832663","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mental health administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02832663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the costs, under two different housing conditions, to the state mental health agency of caring for adults who are homeless and mentally ill. One hundred and twelve clients of the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, living in psychiatric shelters, were randomly assigned to one of two housing types: Evolving Consumer Households or Independent Living apartments. For the next 18 months each client was followed so that the cost of treatment, case management, and housing could be collected and compared. The authors found that treatment and case management costs did not vary by housing type, but housing costs were significantly higher for those assigned to Evolving Consumer Households. Regardless of original housing assignment, treatment costs were lower for clients who remained where they were originally placed. The authors conclude that providing support for clients that increases housing stability reduces their need for treatment and that independent living arrangements may be a more cost-effective policy choice.

患有精神疾病和以前无家可归的成年人的住房费用。
本研究的目的是评估在两种不同的住房条件下,国家精神卫生机构照顾无家可归和患有精神疾病的成年人的成本。住在精神病收容所的马萨诸塞州精神卫生部门的112名客户被随机分配到两种住房类型中的一种:发展消费家庭或独立生活公寓。在接下来的18个月里,对每位患者进行了随访,以便收集和比较治疗、病例管理和住房的费用。作者发现,治疗和病例管理费用并不因住房类型而异,但住房成本明显高于那些分配给发展消费者家庭的住房成本。不管原来的住房分配,治疗费用较低的客户仍然在原来的安置。作者得出结论,为客户提供支持,增加住房稳定性,减少他们对治疗的需求,独立生活安排可能是一个更具成本效益的政策选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信