Cyanoacrylate Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Inguinal Hernia Repair. Does It Have Advantages?

L. Vega, Kevin Oh-Uiginn, D. Carmona, D. Salazar, R. Rodríguez, Hasan Janafse, M. Molinete, J. Camps
{"title":"Cyanoacrylate Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Inguinal Hernia Repair. Does It Have Advantages?","authors":"L. Vega, Kevin Oh-Uiginn, D. Carmona, D. Salazar, R. Rodríguez, Hasan Janafse, M. Molinete, J. Camps","doi":"10.12691/JS-7-1-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To compare the short-term effects of mesh fixation in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Materials and methods: Prospective, randomized and unicentric study of patients undergoing primary, unilateral inguinal hernia, operated under the Lichtenstein technique; comparing the mesh fixation with n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (group I) versus non-reabsorbable suture (group II). The study variables in the postoperative period focused on the incidence of pain, complications and hernia recurrence. Results: 120 patients have been included, from 26/11/2013 to 09/02/2015. 60 patients in each treatment arm. In group I pain was recorded (EVA ≥3) at 24h in 19 patients, at 30 days in 9 patients and at 90 days in 1 patient, against 22, 15 and 6 patients in group II (p= 0, 56; p= 0.17, p= 0.048, specifically). The incidence of morbidity at 90 days was 15% in the cyanoacrylate group and 13.33% in the suture fixation group, p= 0.79. Repairs were 4.8 minutes faster in the glue group (p= 0.02). There were no early recurrences in either group. Discussion: There were no differences in the incidence of acute pain evaluated at 24 hours after the intervention or at 30 days, but there was a lower incidence in favor of the glue at the 90-day assessment p= 0.048. There were no statistically significant differences in complications at 90 days, we objective reduction in surgical time of 4.8 minutes in favor of the cyanoacrylate. There were not early recurrence. ANZCTR registration with reference number ACTRN12616000242426.","PeriodicalId":89556,"journal":{"name":"Global journal of surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/JS-7-1-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the short-term effects of mesh fixation in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Materials and methods: Prospective, randomized and unicentric study of patients undergoing primary, unilateral inguinal hernia, operated under the Lichtenstein technique; comparing the mesh fixation with n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (group I) versus non-reabsorbable suture (group II). The study variables in the postoperative period focused on the incidence of pain, complications and hernia recurrence. Results: 120 patients have been included, from 26/11/2013 to 09/02/2015. 60 patients in each treatment arm. In group I pain was recorded (EVA ≥3) at 24h in 19 patients, at 30 days in 9 patients and at 90 days in 1 patient, against 22, 15 and 6 patients in group II (p= 0, 56; p= 0.17, p= 0.048, specifically). The incidence of morbidity at 90 days was 15% in the cyanoacrylate group and 13.33% in the suture fixation group, p= 0.79. Repairs were 4.8 minutes faster in the glue group (p= 0.02). There were no early recurrences in either group. Discussion: There were no differences in the incidence of acute pain evaluated at 24 hours after the intervention or at 30 days, but there was a lower incidence in favor of the glue at the 90-day assessment p= 0.048. There were no statistically significant differences in complications at 90 days, we objective reduction in surgical time of 4.8 minutes in favor of the cyanoacrylate. There were not early recurrence. ANZCTR registration with reference number ACTRN12616000242426.
氰基丙烯酸酯补片固定在腹股沟利希滕斯坦疝修补中的应用。它有优势吗?
目的:比较补片固定在腹股沟列支敦士登疝修补术中的近期效果。材料和方法:前瞻性、随机、单中心研究,接受Lichtenstein技术手术的原发性单侧腹股沟疝患者;比较正丁基-2-氰基丙烯酸酯补片固定(I组)与不可再吸收缝线固定(II组)。术后的研究变量主要集中在疼痛、并发症和疝气复发的发生率。结果:2013年11月26日至2015年2月9日共纳入120例患者。每个治疗组60名患者。1组有19例患者在24小时疼痛记录(EVA≥3),9例患者在30天疼痛记录(EVA≥3),1例患者在90天疼痛记录(EVA≥3),而II组有22例、15例和6例(p= 0,56;P = 0.17, P = 0.048)。氰基丙烯酸酯组90天的发病率为15%,缝合固定组为13.33%,p= 0.79。胶粘剂组修复时间缩短4.8分钟(p= 0.02)。两组均无早期复发。讨论:在干预后24小时和30天评估急性疼痛的发生率没有差异,但在90天评估时,支持胶水的发生率较低p= 0.048。90天的并发症无统计学差异,我们的目标是减少手术时间4.8分钟,有利于氰基丙烯酸酯。无早期复发。ANZCTR注册编号为ACTRN12616000242426。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信