The Gadamerian Discourse in China and the Fusion of Aesthetic Realms

IF 1.7 2区社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES

Critical Asian Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-10 DOI:10.4312/as.2023.11.1.299-316

Jana S. Rošker

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Based on comparative philosophical methodology, this paper presents a new hermeneutic method for interpreting Chinese (especially ancient Chinese) texts. It first introduces the rich tradition of Chinese hermeneutics and then analyses its possible dialogues with European hermeneutic methods, especially Gadamer’s “fusion of horizons”. It identifies some methodological problems inherent in this method and, on this basis, proposes the application of a new hermeneutic method that may be more suitable for the interpretation of traditional Chinese metaphysical and literary texts. It is based on the traditional philosophical-aesthetic notion of jingjie 境界. The author preliminarily refers to this method as a “fusion of aesthetic realms”.

查看原文本刊更多论文

中国的伽达美尔话语与审美领域的融合

本文以比较哲学的方法论为基础，提出了一种新的诠释学方法来解释汉语(特别是古代汉语)文本。首先介绍了中国解释学的丰富传统，然后分析了中国解释学与欧洲解释学方法，特别是伽达默尔的“视界融合”的可能对话。它指出了这种方法固有的一些方法论问题，并在此基础上提出了一种新的解释学方法的应用，这种方法可能更适合于中国传统的形而上学和文学文本的解释。它是建立在传统的哲学美学观念的基础上的。笔者初步将这种方法称为“审美境界的融合”。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Critical Asian Studies AREA STUDIES-

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

3.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Asian Studies is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that welcomes unsolicited essays, reviews, translations, interviews, photo essays, and letters about Asia and the Pacific, particularly those that challenge the accepted formulas for understanding the Asia and Pacific regions, the world, and ourselves. Published now by Routledge Journals, part of the Taylor & Francis Group, Critical Asian Studies remains true to the mission that was articulated for the journal in 1967 by the Committee of Concerned Asian Scholars.