Scrutinizing Ashley X: Presumed Medical “Solutions” vs. Real Social Adaptation

W. Peace, Claire Roy
{"title":"Scrutinizing Ashley X: Presumed Medical “Solutions” vs. Real Social Adaptation","authors":"W. Peace, Claire Roy","doi":"10.5840/JPSL20141439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the end of 2006 Daniel Gunther and Douglas Diekema published “Attenuating Growth in Children with Profound Developmental Disability: A New Approach to an Old Dilemma” in the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine that caused a storm of controversy. Ill prepared for the spotlight and intense media interest, Ashley X’s parents complicated matters in January of 2007 by posting a blog about their daughter and children like her deemed “pillow angels”. It is our belief that Diekema, Ashley X’s parents, and proponents of the Ashley Treatment, now referred to as growth attenuation, are disingenuous. On the one hand they collectively argue the Ashley Treatment was about one profoundly cognitively and physically disabled child and yet simultaneously promote the treatment for other “pillow angels.”","PeriodicalId":88325,"journal":{"name":"The journal of philosophy, science & law","volume":"100 1","pages":"33-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of philosophy, science & law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/JPSL20141439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

At the end of 2006 Daniel Gunther and Douglas Diekema published “Attenuating Growth in Children with Profound Developmental Disability: A New Approach to an Old Dilemma” in the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine that caused a storm of controversy. Ill prepared for the spotlight and intense media interest, Ashley X’s parents complicated matters in January of 2007 by posting a blog about their daughter and children like her deemed “pillow angels”. It is our belief that Diekema, Ashley X’s parents, and proponents of the Ashley Treatment, now referred to as growth attenuation, are disingenuous. On the one hand they collectively argue the Ashley Treatment was about one profoundly cognitively and physically disabled child and yet simultaneously promote the treatment for other “pillow angels.”
审视阿什利X:假定的医疗“解决方案”与真正的社会适应
2006年底,Daniel Gunther和Douglas Diekema在《儿科和青少年医学档案》上发表了一篇题为《患有严重发育障碍的儿童的生长减缓:一种解决旧困境的新方法》的文章,引起了一场争议风暴。2007年1月,阿什利·X的父母没有准备好面对聚光灯和媒体的强烈关注,他们在博客上发表了一篇关于女儿和她眼中的“枕头天使”的孩子们的文章,把事情复杂化了。我们认为,迪克玛、阿什利X的父母以及阿什利疗法(现在被称为生长衰减疗法)的支持者是不诚实的。一方面,他们集体认为阿什利治疗是针对一个认知和身体严重残疾的孩子,但同时也促进了其他“枕头天使”的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书