Does subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation affect the static balance at different frequencies?

Fatma Oz , Bircan Yucekeya , Irem Huzmeli , Atilla Yilmaz
{"title":"Does subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation affect the static balance at different frequencies?","authors":"Fatma Oz ,&nbsp;Bircan Yucekeya ,&nbsp;Irem Huzmeli ,&nbsp;Atilla Yilmaz","doi":"10.1016/j.neucie.2022.11.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) with different stimulation frequencies on static balance.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Twenty patients (15 males and 5 females), aged between 43 and 81 (mean: 60.05<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.4) years, who had been diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and undergone STN-DBS surgery were included in the study. Static balance was assessed with TecnoBody Rehabilitation System at four different frequencies: 230, 130, 90 and 60<!--> <!-->Hz and off-stimulation. Static balance tests were ‘stabilometric test, stabilometric compared bipedal closed/opened eye, stabilometric compared mono pedal (right/left foot)’. These tests reported the centre of pressure data ‘ellipse area, perimeter, front/back and mediolateral standard deviations’.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were no statically differences between the static balance test results at any frequency (<em>p</em> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.05), but results were found better at 90<!--> <!-->Hz. Stabilometric compared bipedal opened eye forward–backward standard deviation result was significant between off-stimulation and 130<!--> <!-->Hz (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.04). Different frequency stimulation affected the static balance categories percentage with no statistical significance between off-stimulation and others (all <em>p</em> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study showed that STN-DBS did not affect the static balance negatively. Low-frequency (LF) stimulation improved the static equilibrium. Posturography systems will give more precise and quantitative results in similar studies with wide frequency ranges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74273,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 60-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529849622000867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) with different stimulation frequencies on static balance.

Materials and methods

Twenty patients (15 males and 5 females), aged between 43 and 81 (mean: 60.05 ± 7.4) years, who had been diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and undergone STN-DBS surgery were included in the study. Static balance was assessed with TecnoBody Rehabilitation System at four different frequencies: 230, 130, 90 and 60 Hz and off-stimulation. Static balance tests were ‘stabilometric test, stabilometric compared bipedal closed/opened eye, stabilometric compared mono pedal (right/left foot)’. These tests reported the centre of pressure data ‘ellipse area, perimeter, front/back and mediolateral standard deviations’.

Results

There were no statically differences between the static balance test results at any frequency (p > 0.05), but results were found better at 90 Hz. Stabilometric compared bipedal opened eye forward–backward standard deviation result was significant between off-stimulation and 130 Hz (p = 0.04). Different frequency stimulation affected the static balance categories percentage with no statistical significance between off-stimulation and others (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion

This study showed that STN-DBS did not affect the static balance negatively. Low-frequency (LF) stimulation improved the static equilibrium. Posturography systems will give more precise and quantitative results in similar studies with wide frequency ranges.

丘脑底核深部脑刺激在不同频率下会影响静态平衡吗?
目的探讨不同刺激频率的双侧丘脑底核深部脑电刺激(STN-DBS)对静态平衡的影响。材料和方法研究纳入了20名患者(15名男性和5名女性),年龄在43至81岁之间(平均值:60.05±7.4),他们被诊断为特发性帕金森病(PD)并接受了STN-DBS手术。使用TecnoBody康复系统在四个不同频率下评估静态平衡:230、130、90和60 Hz以及非刺激。静态平衡测试为“稳定性测试、双足闭/睁眼稳定性比较、单足(右脚/左脚)稳定性比较”。这些测试报告了压力中心数据“椭圆面积、周长、前/后和中侧标准差”。结果在任何频率下,静态平衡测试结果之间都没有静态差异(p>0.05),但在90Hz时结果更好。稳定性比较两足动物睁眼前后标准差结果在非刺激和130Hz之间具有显著性(p=0.04)。不同频率的刺激影响静态平衡类别百分比,非刺激和其他刺激之间没有统计学意义(均p>0.05)。结论本研究表明STN-DBS不影响静态平衡消极的低频(LF)刺激改善了静态平衡。在频率范围较宽的类似研究中,后尿路造影系统将给出更精确和定量的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信