Unmanning the Police Manhunt: Vertical Security as Pacification

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Socialist Studies Pub Date : 2013-12-12 DOI:10.18740/S4F591
T. Wall
{"title":"Unmanning the Police Manhunt: Vertical Security as Pacification","authors":"T. Wall","doi":"10.18740/S4F591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a critique of military aerial drones being “repurposed” as domestic security technologies. Mapping this process in regards to domestic policing agencies in the United States, the case of police drones speaks directly to the importation of actual military and colonial architectures into the routine spaces of the “homeland”, disclosing insidious entwinements of war and police, metropole and colony, accumulation and securitization. The “boomeranging” of military UAVs is but one contemporary example how war power and police power have long been allied and it is the logic of security and the practice of pacification that animates both. The police drone is but one of the most nascent technologies that extends or reproduces the police’s own design on the pacification of territory. Therefore, we must be careful not to fetishize the domestic police drone by framing this development as emblematic of a radical break from traditional policing mandates – the case of police drones is interesting less because it speaks about the militarization of the police, which it certainly does, but more about the ways in which it accentuates the mutual mandates and joint rationalities of war abroad and policing at home. Finally, the paper considers how the animus of police drones is productive of a particular form of organized suspicion, namely, the manhunt. Here, the “unmanning” of police power extends the police capability to not only see or know its dominion, but to quite literally track, pursue, and ultimately capture human prey.","PeriodicalId":29667,"journal":{"name":"Socialist Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"60","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18740/S4F591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

Abstract

This article provides a critique of military aerial drones being “repurposed” as domestic security technologies. Mapping this process in regards to domestic policing agencies in the United States, the case of police drones speaks directly to the importation of actual military and colonial architectures into the routine spaces of the “homeland”, disclosing insidious entwinements of war and police, metropole and colony, accumulation and securitization. The “boomeranging” of military UAVs is but one contemporary example how war power and police power have long been allied and it is the logic of security and the practice of pacification that animates both. The police drone is but one of the most nascent technologies that extends or reproduces the police’s own design on the pacification of territory. Therefore, we must be careful not to fetishize the domestic police drone by framing this development as emblematic of a radical break from traditional policing mandates – the case of police drones is interesting less because it speaks about the militarization of the police, which it certainly does, but more about the ways in which it accentuates the mutual mandates and joint rationalities of war abroad and policing at home. Finally, the paper considers how the animus of police drones is productive of a particular form of organized suspicion, namely, the manhunt. Here, the “unmanning” of police power extends the police capability to not only see or know its dominion, but to quite literally track, pursue, and ultimately capture human prey.
解除警察追捕:纵向安全作为绥靖
这篇文章对军用无人机被“重新利用”为国内安全技术提出了批评。将这一过程映射到美国国内的警务机构中,警用无人机的案例直接说明了实际的军事和殖民建筑进入“家园”的日常空间,揭示了战争与警察、大都市与殖民地、积累与证券化的潜在纠缠。军用无人机的“回旋镖”只是当代战争力量和警察力量长期结盟的一个例子,安全的逻辑和和平的实践使两者活跃起来。警用无人机只是一种最新兴的技术之一,它扩展或复制了警方在维持治安方面的设计。因此,我们必须小心,不要盲目崇拜国内的无人驾驶警察,把这一发展视为对传统警务任务的彻底突破的象征——无人驾驶警察的案例之所以有趣,并不是因为它谈到了警察的军事化,而它确实是这样做的,而是因为它强调了海外战争和国内警务的相互授权和联合合理性。最后,本文考虑了警察无人机的敌意是如何产生一种特殊形式的有组织的怀疑,即追捕。在这里,警察权力的“无人控制”扩展了警察的能力,不仅可以看到或知道自己的统治范围,而且可以毫不夸张地跟踪、追捕并最终捕获人类猎物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信