The Models of Narrators Whose Degrees Get Down by Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar in his book“Taqreeb” from his other books: نماذج من الرواة الذين أنزل الحافظ ابن حجر درجاتهم في التقريب عن كتبه الأخرى

Q3 Multidisciplinary
Mohammad Asem Harun Mohammad Asem Harun
{"title":"The Models of Narrators Whose Degrees Get Down by Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar in his book“Taqreeb” from his other books: نماذج من الرواة الذين أنزل الحافظ ابن حجر درجاتهم في التقريب عن كتبه الأخرى","authors":"Mohammad Asem Harun Mohammad Asem Harun","doi":"10.26389/ajsrp.h061021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The science of verifying narrators credible is one of the most important result of the efforts of Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani- may God have mercy on him- He used to follow the men and judge them, and his judgment became an important reference for those who came after him from among the researchers, and indeed many of them relied on his judgment in their judgment on the narrators. However, his sayings differed in judging some of the narrators, so we find that he judges some in one book with a ruling, and he is judged by another in another book of his. Who urges me to carefully consider his method of verifying the narrators; In order to trace that difference, with an attempt to identify its causes, and to clarify the correctness of it? Through the study of five narrators, prefacing the way by an explanation of the ranks of verifying narrators according to Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar, the reasons for the difference in his sayings, and the Theory for choosing the most correct saying according to him. Concluding with the most important results that I have reached from this study. At las I ask Allah to be of benefit and benefit to the writer and the reader, he is the Guardian of that and the capable of it, and praise be to God, Lord of the Worlds, and prayers and peace be upon our Prophet Muhammad and all his family and companions.","PeriodicalId":17009,"journal":{"name":"journal of sciences islamic republic of iran","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"journal of sciences islamic republic of iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26389/ajsrp.h061021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The science of verifying narrators credible is one of the most important result of the efforts of Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani- may God have mercy on him- He used to follow the men and judge them, and his judgment became an important reference for those who came after him from among the researchers, and indeed many of them relied on his judgment in their judgment on the narrators. However, his sayings differed in judging some of the narrators, so we find that he judges some in one book with a ruling, and he is judged by another in another book of his. Who urges me to carefully consider his method of verifying the narrators; In order to trace that difference, with an attempt to identify its causes, and to clarify the correctness of it? Through the study of five narrators, prefacing the way by an explanation of the ranks of verifying narrators according to Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar, the reasons for the difference in his sayings, and the Theory for choosing the most correct saying according to him. Concluding with the most important results that I have reached from this study. At las I ask Allah to be of benefit and benefit to the writer and the reader, he is the Guardian of that and the capable of it, and praise be to God, Lord of the Worlds, and prayers and peace be upon our Prophet Muhammad and all his family and companions.
验证叙述者可信度的科学是Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani努力的最重要成果之一——愿真主怜悯他——他曾经跟踪人们并对他们进行判断,他的判断成为了他之后的研究者的重要参考,事实上,他们中的许多人在对叙述者的判断中依赖于他的判断。然而,他的说法在判断一些叙述者时是不同的,所以我们发现,他在一本书中用裁决来判断一些人,而他在另一本书中被另一个人判断。他敦促我仔细考虑他验证叙述者的方法;为了追踪这种差异,试图找出其原因,并澄清其正确性?通过对五位叙述者的研究,通过对哈菲兹·伊本·哈贾尔语录的验证等级、语录差异的原因以及根据哈菲兹·伊本·哈贾尔语录选择最正确语录的理论的解释,引出了本文的思路。最后是我从这项研究中得出的最重要的结论。最后,我祈求真主保佑作者和读者,他是作者和读者的守护者,他是读者和读者的守护者,他是读者和读者的守护者,赞颂真主,众世界的主,愿我们的先知穆罕默德和他的家人和同伴们祈祷与平安。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
journal of sciences islamic republic of iran
journal of sciences islamic republic of iran Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信