{"title":"Nonreligion and Secularity in Canada","authors":"Zachary A. Munro, Sarah Wilkins-Laflamme","doi":"10.1163/25892525-bja10012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue of Secular Studies critically engages with key theoretical debates in nonreligion and secularity studies and contributes to a growing body of empirical research on the Canadian secular landscape. Having gained increasing attention from scholars over the past two decades, there is now a growing body of research in the subfield of nonreligion and secular studies. Notable focuses have been on nonreligious communities, such as the Sunday Assembly (e.g. Cross 2017; Smith 2017; Mortimer, Tim, and Melanie Prideaux 2018), nonreligious identities (e.g. Hacket 2014; Lanman et al. 2019; Lee 2014, 2015; Manning 2015; Sumerau and Cragun 2016; Voas and Day 2010; Zuckerman and Shook 2017), irreligious disaffiliation (e.g. Nica 2020; Thiessen and Wilkins-Laflamme 2017; Zuckerman 2012), political polarization (Baker and Smith 2015; Wilkins-Laflamme 2016), and on how the nonreligious meaningfully differ from their religious counterparts in values and life behaviors (Manning 2015; Thiessen andWilkins-Laflamme 2020; Zuckerman 2008, 2014). Further existing researchhas engagedwith theoretical debates regarding the categories of ‘nonreligion’ and ‘secularity’ (Lee 2012, 2014, 2015; Quack 2014; Quack and Schuch 2017; Quack et al. 2020) and potential replacement categories, such as ‘worldview’ and ‘meaning makings systems’ (Taves 2020; Taves et al. 2018) or ‘cosmic belief systems’ (Baker and Smith 2015), as well as the multiplicity of secularities (Lee 2015; 2019; Taylor 2007;Wohlrab-Sahr and Burchardt 2012). The contributions made by scholars in this special issue extend this knowledge into new areas, highlighting empirical locations where nonreligion and secularity are becoming increasingly significant. Additionally, the","PeriodicalId":29677,"journal":{"name":"Secular Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Secular Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/25892525-bja10012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This special issue of Secular Studies critically engages with key theoretical debates in nonreligion and secularity studies and contributes to a growing body of empirical research on the Canadian secular landscape. Having gained increasing attention from scholars over the past two decades, there is now a growing body of research in the subfield of nonreligion and secular studies. Notable focuses have been on nonreligious communities, such as the Sunday Assembly (e.g. Cross 2017; Smith 2017; Mortimer, Tim, and Melanie Prideaux 2018), nonreligious identities (e.g. Hacket 2014; Lanman et al. 2019; Lee 2014, 2015; Manning 2015; Sumerau and Cragun 2016; Voas and Day 2010; Zuckerman and Shook 2017), irreligious disaffiliation (e.g. Nica 2020; Thiessen and Wilkins-Laflamme 2017; Zuckerman 2012), political polarization (Baker and Smith 2015; Wilkins-Laflamme 2016), and on how the nonreligious meaningfully differ from their religious counterparts in values and life behaviors (Manning 2015; Thiessen andWilkins-Laflamme 2020; Zuckerman 2008, 2014). Further existing researchhas engagedwith theoretical debates regarding the categories of ‘nonreligion’ and ‘secularity’ (Lee 2012, 2014, 2015; Quack 2014; Quack and Schuch 2017; Quack et al. 2020) and potential replacement categories, such as ‘worldview’ and ‘meaning makings systems’ (Taves 2020; Taves et al. 2018) or ‘cosmic belief systems’ (Baker and Smith 2015), as well as the multiplicity of secularities (Lee 2015; 2019; Taylor 2007;Wohlrab-Sahr and Burchardt 2012). The contributions made by scholars in this special issue extend this knowledge into new areas, highlighting empirical locations where nonreligion and secularity are becoming increasingly significant. Additionally, the
这期《世俗研究》特刊批判性地探讨了非宗教和世俗研究中的关键理论辩论,并为加拿大世俗景观的实证研究做出了贡献。在过去的二十年里,非宗教和世俗研究的分支领域越来越受到学者们的关注。值得注意的重点是非宗教社区,如周日大会(例如Cross 2017;史密斯2017年;Mortimer, Tim, and Melanie Prideaux 2018),非宗教身份(例如Hacket 2014;Lanman et al. 2019;Lee 2014, 2015;曼宁2015;Sumerau and Cragun 2016;Voas和Day 2010;Zuckerman and Shook 2017),无宗教信仰(例如Nica 2020;Thiessen and Wilkins-Laflamme 2017;Zuckerman 2012),政治两极分化(Baker and Smith 2015;Wilkins-Laflamme 2016),以及非宗教人士在价值观和生活行为上与宗教人士有何有意义的不同(Manning 2015;Thiessen & wilkins - laflamme 2020;Zuckerman 2008, 2014)。进一步的现有研究涉及关于“非宗教”和“世俗”类别的理论辩论(Lee 2012, 2014, 2015;庸医2014;Quack and Schuch 2017;Quack et al. 2020)和潜在的替代类别,如“世界观”和“意义构成系统”(Taves 2020;Taves et al. 2018)或“宇宙信仰体系”(Baker and Smith 2015),以及世俗性的多样性(Lee 2015;2019;Taylor 2007; wohlrabb - sahr and Burchardt 2012)。学者们在本期特刊中所作的贡献将这些知识扩展到新的领域,突出了非宗教和世俗性日益重要的实证领域。此外,