Evaluation of the Use of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors (G-CSFs) for Neutropenia Primary Prophylaxis in Solid Tumors at a Tertiary Care Hospital, Retrospective Study

A. af, A. Alnatsheh, M. Aseeri, T. Alfayea
{"title":"Evaluation of the Use of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors (G-CSFs) for Neutropenia Primary Prophylaxis in Solid Tumors at a Tertiary Care Hospital, Retrospective Study","authors":"A. af, A. Alnatsheh, M. Aseeri, T. Alfayea","doi":"10.4172/2329-6887.1000248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: First, to determine the appropriate prescribing of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for febrile neutropenia (FN) as primary prophylaxis during the first cycle of chemotherapy in breast, lung, gastric, esophageal, nasopharyngeal or colorectal cancer patients. Second, to compare the incidence of FN between patients who received G-CSF appropriately and inappropriately. \nMethods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the Princess Norah bint Abdulrahman Al Faisal Oncology Center. We used cancer registry report which included adult patients with newly diagnosed solid tumors, such as breast, lung, gastric, esophageal, nasopharyngeal and colorectal cancer between January 2013 and December 2013. Patients were excluded if they did not receive chemotherapy after diagnosis and had renal or liver impairment. The appropriate indication of G-CSFs for FN primary prophylaxis was evaluated based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and published data. \nResults: G-CSFs were appropriately prescribed as primary prophylaxis in 85% of patients. The incidence of FN between the appropriate and inappropriate groups were not statistically significant (p=0.315). However, G-CSF use was inappropriate in 28 of the 29 patients who received chemotherapy regimens with high risk of developing FN; among these patients only three patients developed FN. \nConclusion: The prescribing of G-CSFs for FN primary prophylaxis at our institution was found to be inappropriate on some occasions; mostly when G-CSFs were not prescribed with regimens associated with high risk of FN.","PeriodicalId":16958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacovigilance","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacovigilance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6887.1000248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: First, to determine the appropriate prescribing of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for febrile neutropenia (FN) as primary prophylaxis during the first cycle of chemotherapy in breast, lung, gastric, esophageal, nasopharyngeal or colorectal cancer patients. Second, to compare the incidence of FN between patients who received G-CSF appropriately and inappropriately. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the Princess Norah bint Abdulrahman Al Faisal Oncology Center. We used cancer registry report which included adult patients with newly diagnosed solid tumors, such as breast, lung, gastric, esophageal, nasopharyngeal and colorectal cancer between January 2013 and December 2013. Patients were excluded if they did not receive chemotherapy after diagnosis and had renal or liver impairment. The appropriate indication of G-CSFs for FN primary prophylaxis was evaluated based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and published data. Results: G-CSFs were appropriately prescribed as primary prophylaxis in 85% of patients. The incidence of FN between the appropriate and inappropriate groups were not statistically significant (p=0.315). However, G-CSF use was inappropriate in 28 of the 29 patients who received chemotherapy regimens with high risk of developing FN; among these patients only three patients developed FN. Conclusion: The prescribing of G-CSFs for FN primary prophylaxis at our institution was found to be inappropriate on some occasions; mostly when G-CSFs were not prescribed with regimens associated with high risk of FN.
评价粒细胞集落刺激因子(g - csf)在三级医院实体瘤中性粒细胞减少初级预防中的应用,回顾性研究
目的:首先,确定在乳腺癌、肺癌、胃癌、食管癌、鼻咽癌或结直肠癌患者的第一周期化疗中,粒细胞集落刺激因子(g - csf)作为发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的一级预防用药的合适处方。第二,比较适当和不适当使用G-CSF的患者FN的发生率。方法:这是一项在Norah bint Abdulrahman Al Faisal公主肿瘤中心进行的回顾性队列研究。我们使用癌症登记报告,其中包括2013年1月至2013年12月期间新诊断的实体肿瘤成人患者,如乳腺癌、肺癌、胃癌、食管癌、鼻咽癌和结直肠癌。排除诊断后未接受化疗且有肾或肝损害的患者。根据国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南和已发表的数据,评估了g - csf用于FN一级预防的适当适应症。结果:85%的患者适当使用g - csf作为初级预防药物。适宜组与不适宜组FN发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(p=0.315)。然而,在29名接受FN高风险化疗方案的患者中,有28名患者不适宜使用G-CSF;这些患者中只有3例发生FN。结论:我院在FN一级预防中使用g - csf处方存在不适宜的情况;大多数情况下,g - csf并没有与FN高风险相关的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信