Associations between participation and personal factors in community-dwelling adults post-stroke.

Melanie Hoyle, Pamela Meredith, Tamara Ownsworth, Asaduzzaman Khan, Louise Gustafsson
{"title":"Associations between participation and personal factors in community-dwelling adults post-stroke.","authors":"Melanie Hoyle, Pamela Meredith, Tamara Ownsworth, Asaduzzaman Khan, Louise Gustafsson","doi":"10.1017/BrImp.2022.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine associations between post-stroke participation and personal factors, including demographic characteristics, self- and threat appraisals, and personality variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exploratory cross-sectional study with purpose-designed survey was completed online or via mail. The survey was comprised of demographic and health-related questions and multiple questionnaires, including the Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0 (SISv3) (participation/perceived recovery), Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) (participation), Head Injury Semantic Differential III (pre- vs post-stroke self-concept/self-discrepancy), Appraisal of Threat and Avoidance Questionnaire (threat appraisal), Life Orientation Test - Revised (optimism) and Relationships Questionnaire (adult attachment style) that measured variables of interest. Sixty-two participants, aged 24-96 years who had experienced a stroke (one or multiple events) and had returned to community living, completed the survey. Associations were examined using correlations, and univariate and multiple linear regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression analysis showed that greater participation, measured using the CIQ, was associated with younger age, female gender, lower self-discrepancy and higher perceived recovery, explaining 69% of the variability in CIQ participation. Further, greater participation on the SISv3 was associated with lower self-discrepancy and higher perceived recovery, explaining 64% of the variability in SISv3 participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results indicate that personal factors, particularly self-appraisals like self-concept/self-discrepancy, in combination with perceived recovery may be important in explaining a large portion of variance in post-stroke participation. Specifically, findings highlight the interrelatedness of self-concept change, perceived recovery and post-stroke participation. Further longitudinal research is needed to clarify the directionality of these associations throughout the hospital-to-home transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":90705,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium : [proceedings]. Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium","volume":"4 1","pages":"456-473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium : [proceedings]. Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2022.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine associations between post-stroke participation and personal factors, including demographic characteristics, self- and threat appraisals, and personality variables.

Methods: An exploratory cross-sectional study with purpose-designed survey was completed online or via mail. The survey was comprised of demographic and health-related questions and multiple questionnaires, including the Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0 (SISv3) (participation/perceived recovery), Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) (participation), Head Injury Semantic Differential III (pre- vs post-stroke self-concept/self-discrepancy), Appraisal of Threat and Avoidance Questionnaire (threat appraisal), Life Orientation Test - Revised (optimism) and Relationships Questionnaire (adult attachment style) that measured variables of interest. Sixty-two participants, aged 24-96 years who had experienced a stroke (one or multiple events) and had returned to community living, completed the survey. Associations were examined using correlations, and univariate and multiple linear regression analyses.

Results: Regression analysis showed that greater participation, measured using the CIQ, was associated with younger age, female gender, lower self-discrepancy and higher perceived recovery, explaining 69% of the variability in CIQ participation. Further, greater participation on the SISv3 was associated with lower self-discrepancy and higher perceived recovery, explaining 64% of the variability in SISv3 participation.

Conclusions: Results indicate that personal factors, particularly self-appraisals like self-concept/self-discrepancy, in combination with perceived recovery may be important in explaining a large portion of variance in post-stroke participation. Specifically, findings highlight the interrelatedness of self-concept change, perceived recovery and post-stroke participation. Further longitudinal research is needed to clarify the directionality of these associations throughout the hospital-to-home transition.

中风后在社区居住的成年人的参与情况与个人因素之间的关联。
目的:研究中风后参与与个人因素(包括人口统计学特征、自我评价和威胁评价以及人格变量)之间的关系:方法: 这是一项探索性横断面研究,研究人员通过在线或邮寄方式完成了目的明确的调查。调查内容包括人口统计学、健康相关问题和多种问卷,其中包括卒中影响量表 3.0 版(SISv3)。0(SISv3)(参与/感知康复)、社区融合问卷(CIQ)(参与)、头部损伤语义差异 III(脑卒中前与脑卒中后自我概念/自我差异)、威胁评估和回避问卷(威胁评估)、生活取向测试 - 修订版(乐观)和关系问卷(成人依恋风格),以测量相关变量。62 名年龄在 24-96 岁之间、经历过中风(一次或多次)并已重返社区生活的参与者完成了调查。我们使用相关性分析、单变量分析和多元线性回归分析对这些变量之间的联系进行了研究:回归分析表明,使用 CIQ 测量的参与度越高,与年龄较小、性别为女性、自我差异较低和感知康复程度较高有关,可解释 CIQ 参与度变异的 69%。此外,更多参与 SISv3 与较低的自我怀疑度和较高的恢复感知度相关,可解释 64% 的 SISv3 参与度差异:结论:研究结果表明,个人因素,尤其是自我评价,如自我概念/自我差异,与感知康复相结合,可能是解释脑卒中后参与度差异的重要因素。具体来说,研究结果强调了自我概念变化、感知康复和卒中后参与的相互关联性。需要进一步开展纵向研究,以明确这些关联在从医院到家庭的整个转变过程中的方向性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信