Cultural considerations in debriefing: a systematic review of the literature.

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning Pub Date : 2021-05-24 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000857
Janice C Palaganas, Matthew Charnetski, Sharon Dowell, Albert Kam Ming Chan, Kim Leighton
{"title":"Cultural considerations in debriefing: a systematic review of the literature.","authors":"Janice C Palaganas, Matthew Charnetski, Sharon Dowell, Albert Kam Ming Chan, Kim Leighton","doi":"10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conversations are influenced by cultural perceptions, beliefs and values. Debriefing is a learning conversation. Without cross-cultural engagement or culturally relevant teaching, learning may be compromised and may result in an outcome opposite of that intended.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review explores cultural considerations in healthcare simulation debriefing. We sought to explore findings that could help debriefers create culturally responsive and inclusive debriefings.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed articles in any language and focused on healthcare simulation debriefing and global cultural considerations. Research study methods included qualitative, quantitative or both. The review included any health-related profession and level of learner.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Three studies met the criteria. The purposes of the three studies were significantly different and did not directly study cultural considerations in debriefing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The learner-educator relationship is at risk and learning may be negatively impacted without addressing cultural awareness. More studies are needed to fully describe the effect of culture on successful debriefing.</p>","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Conversations are influenced by cultural perceptions, beliefs and values. Debriefing is a learning conversation. Without cross-cultural engagement or culturally relevant teaching, learning may be compromised and may result in an outcome opposite of that intended.

Objective: This systematic review explores cultural considerations in healthcare simulation debriefing. We sought to explore findings that could help debriefers create culturally responsive and inclusive debriefings.

Study selection: Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed articles in any language and focused on healthcare simulation debriefing and global cultural considerations. Research study methods included qualitative, quantitative or both. The review included any health-related profession and level of learner.

Findings: Three studies met the criteria. The purposes of the three studies were significantly different and did not directly study cultural considerations in debriefing.

Conclusions: The learner-educator relationship is at risk and learning may be negatively impacted without addressing cultural awareness. More studies are needed to fully describe the effect of culture on successful debriefing.

汇报工作中的文化因素:文献系统回顾。
背景:对话受文化观念、信仰和价值观的影响。汇报是一种学习对话。如果没有跨文化参与或与文化相关的教学,学习可能会受到影响,并可能导致与预期相反的结果:本系统综述探讨了医疗模拟汇报中的文化因素。我们试图探索能够帮助汇报者创建具有文化敏感性和包容性的汇报的研究结果:纳入的研究必须是同行评审文章,语言不限,重点关注医疗模拟汇报和全球文化因素。研究方法包括定性、定量或两者兼有。审查范围包括任何与健康相关的专业和学习者水平:三项研究符合标准。三项研究的目的明显不同,而且没有直接研究汇报中的文化因素:学习者与教育者之间的关系面临风险,如果不解决文化意识问题,学习可能会受到负面影响。需要进行更多的研究,以充分描述文化对成功汇报的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信