A PROSPECTIVE STUDY TO COMPARE CONVENTIONAL CHEMORADIOTHERAPY WITH CONCOMITANT BOOST CHEMORADIOTHERAPY IN CARCINOMA OF ORAL CAVITY

S. Dharmaraj
{"title":"A PROSPECTIVE STUDY TO COMPARE CONVENTIONAL CHEMORADIOTHERAPY WITH CONCOMITANT BOOST CHEMORADIOTHERAPY IN CARCINOMA OF ORAL CAVITY","authors":"S. Dharmaraj","doi":"10.15520/IJMHS.V10I12.3189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : India accounts for the highest incidence of lip and oral  cancer in the world. In early stages,surgery and radiation therapy are curative treatments,while locally a locally advanced carcinoma requires a multidisciplinary  management. A major cause of failure in advanced rapidly growing tumors is accelerated repopulation.To overcome this problem ,various accelerated fractionation radiotherapy techniques are used. \nAim : To compare the outcome,feasibility,tolerability of concomitant boost chemoradiotherapy over conventional chemoradiotherapy \nMaterials and methods: From November 2018 to June 2020,64 patients from J.K.Cancer institute,Kanpur were enrolled in this study.prospective comparative study was done to find out the difference in all groups \nResults : out of 59 eligible patients,31 were assigned to arm A(conventional chemoradiation) and 28 were assigned to arm B (concomitant boost chemoradiation). Out of 31 patients in arm A, 15(48.4%) had complete response(CR),8 (25.8%) had partial response (PR),4(12.9%) had stable disease (SD) and 4(12.9%) had progressive disease (PD).In arm B ,out of 28 patients,14(50%) had complete response,6(21.4%) had partial response,6(21.4%) had stable disease and 2 (7.1%) had progressive disease. \nConclusion : Concomitant boost chemoradiotherapy had a response comparable to conventional chemoradiotherapy with  moderate efficacy and acceptable toxicity.It can be used as alternative to conventional chemoradiotherapy in limited resource setting where the total duration can be minimized and workload can be reduced. \nKeywords : oral cavity,concomitant boost technique,conventional chemoradiotherapy.","PeriodicalId":13590,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Science","volume":"52 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15520/IJMHS.V10I12.3189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : India accounts for the highest incidence of lip and oral  cancer in the world. In early stages,surgery and radiation therapy are curative treatments,while locally a locally advanced carcinoma requires a multidisciplinary  management. A major cause of failure in advanced rapidly growing tumors is accelerated repopulation.To overcome this problem ,various accelerated fractionation radiotherapy techniques are used. Aim : To compare the outcome,feasibility,tolerability of concomitant boost chemoradiotherapy over conventional chemoradiotherapy Materials and methods: From November 2018 to June 2020,64 patients from J.K.Cancer institute,Kanpur were enrolled in this study.prospective comparative study was done to find out the difference in all groups Results : out of 59 eligible patients,31 were assigned to arm A(conventional chemoradiation) and 28 were assigned to arm B (concomitant boost chemoradiation). Out of 31 patients in arm A, 15(48.4%) had complete response(CR),8 (25.8%) had partial response (PR),4(12.9%) had stable disease (SD) and 4(12.9%) had progressive disease (PD).In arm B ,out of 28 patients,14(50%) had complete response,6(21.4%) had partial response,6(21.4%) had stable disease and 2 (7.1%) had progressive disease. Conclusion : Concomitant boost chemoradiotherapy had a response comparable to conventional chemoradiotherapy with  moderate efficacy and acceptable toxicity.It can be used as alternative to conventional chemoradiotherapy in limited resource setting where the total duration can be minimized and workload can be reduced. Keywords : oral cavity,concomitant boost technique,conventional chemoradiotherapy.
一项比较常规放化疗与联合强化放化疗治疗口腔癌的前瞻性研究
背景:印度是世界上口腔癌发病率最高的国家。在早期阶段,手术和放射治疗是治愈性治疗,而局部晚期癌症需要多学科治疗。晚期快速生长的肿瘤失败的一个主要原因是加速再生。为了克服这个问题,使用了各种加速分割放疗技术。目的:比较联合强化放化疗与常规放化疗的疗效、可行性、耐受性。2018年11月至2020年6月,来自坎普尔j.k.癌症研究所的64例患者参加了本研究。结果:在59例符合条件的患者中,31例被分配到A组(常规放化疗),28例被分配到B组(同时增强放化疗)。在A组的31例患者中,15例(48.4%)完全缓解(CR),8例(25.8%)部分缓解(PR),4例(12.9%)病情稳定(SD),4例(12.9%)病情进展(PD)。在B组,28例患者中,14例(50%)完全缓解,6例(21.4%)部分缓解,6例(21.4%)病情稳定,2例(7.1%)病情进展。结论:联合强化放化疗疗效与常规放化疗相当,疗效适中,毒性可接受。在资源有限的情况下,它可以作为传统放化疗的替代方案,可以最大限度地减少总时间和工作量。关键词:口腔,伴随增强技术,常规放化疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信