ASSESSING THE NEEDS AND STRENGTHS OF SELF-HELP GROUPS: OPPORTUNITIES TO MEET HEALTH CARE NEEDS

S. Wituk, Sarah Ealey, L. Brown, M. Shepherd, G. Meissen
{"title":"ASSESSING THE NEEDS AND STRENGTHS OF SELF-HELP GROUPS: OPPORTUNITIES TO MEET HEALTH CARE NEEDS","authors":"S. Wituk, Sarah Ealey, L. Brown, M. Shepherd, G. Meissen","doi":"10.2190/A4MD-TL36-KU15-JPN0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over 15 years ago the Self-Help Network, a statewide clearinghouse for self-help groups, conducted a needs assessment of groups. Findings from that needs assessment provided direction for the activities of the Self-Help Network and insights for health and human service professionals. Health care has changed dramatically over the past 15 years, including interest in alternative treatments, higher costs, managed care, and greater use of Web-based information. It is difficult to determine what impact, if any, these changes have had on the needs of self-help groups. Consequently, the Self-Help Network conducted another asset and needs assessment of groups. Findings show that groups primarily need public awareness and referrals. Groups struggle with organizational issues such as finding meeting locations and shared leadership. The primary benefits of groups are the sharing between members, followed by information and education. Implications for health and human service professionals are discussed, including insights on how they can provide referrals and technical assistance to groups. Over the past half century, self-help groups have become a prominent component of healthcare systems across the world. Yet because of their grassroots nature, the existence of self-help groups was frequently only known through word of mouth.","PeriodicalId":64356,"journal":{"name":"自我保健","volume":"67 11 1","pages":"103-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"自我保健","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/A4MD-TL36-KU15-JPN0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Over 15 years ago the Self-Help Network, a statewide clearinghouse for self-help groups, conducted a needs assessment of groups. Findings from that needs assessment provided direction for the activities of the Self-Help Network and insights for health and human service professionals. Health care has changed dramatically over the past 15 years, including interest in alternative treatments, higher costs, managed care, and greater use of Web-based information. It is difficult to determine what impact, if any, these changes have had on the needs of self-help groups. Consequently, the Self-Help Network conducted another asset and needs assessment of groups. Findings show that groups primarily need public awareness and referrals. Groups struggle with organizational issues such as finding meeting locations and shared leadership. The primary benefits of groups are the sharing between members, followed by information and education. Implications for health and human service professionals are discussed, including insights on how they can provide referrals and technical assistance to groups. Over the past half century, self-help groups have become a prominent component of healthcare systems across the world. Yet because of their grassroots nature, the existence of self-help groups was frequently only known through word of mouth.
评估自助团体的需要和优势:满足保健需要的机会
15年前,自助网络,一个全州范围内的自助团体信息中心,对团体进行了需求评估。需求评估的结果为自助网络的活动提供了方向,并为卫生和人类服务专业人员提供了见解。在过去的15年里,医疗保健发生了巨大的变化,包括对替代治疗的兴趣、更高的成本、管理式护理以及更多地使用基于web的信息。很难确定这些变化对自助团体的需求产生了什么影响,如果有的话。因此,自助网络对群体进行了另一次资产和需求评估。调查结果显示,这些团体主要需要公众的认识和推荐。团体在组织问题上挣扎,比如寻找会议地点和共享领导权。团体的主要好处是成员之间的分享,其次是信息和教育。讨论了对卫生和人类服务专业人员的影响,包括他们如何向群体提供转诊和技术援助的见解。在过去的半个世纪里,自助团体已经成为世界各地医疗保健系统的重要组成部分。然而,由于他们的草根性质,自助团体的存在往往只是通过口口相传。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20554
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书