The Crucial Role of Domenico Losurdo in the Historical, Political and Philosophical Understanding of the “Chinese Way”

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Stefano G. Azzarà
{"title":"The Crucial Role of Domenico Losurdo in the Historical, Political and Philosophical Understanding of the “Chinese Way”","authors":"Stefano G. Azzarà","doi":"10.1080/21598282.2021.2003175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Domenico Losurdo traveled to Beijing for the first time in the 1970s, when (Western) Maoism thrilled a large number of Western progressive intellectuals. But when these intellectuals turned away from China—which they accused of having consolidated an “illiberal totalitarian political regime” but also of having “restored capitalism”—by contrast Losurdo remained a friend of China. For him it was from the Chinese experience and its ability to survive the end of the USSR that one could draw inspiration to confront the most important event in the life of an entire generation: the radical crisis of Marxism and the defeat of the communist movement in the West. Western Marxism, born out of the shock of the First World War, is characterized by a utopian messianism prone to anarchism (the thesis of the extinction of the state, for example, or the claim of an immediate cancelation of borders, or hostility towards economy and technology). In China, on the other hand, Marxism has become the basis of national awareness and the consequent liberation struggle. Once political independence is reached, however, the revolution continues today in order to achieve economic independence. Hence the need for a re-elaboration of the same Marxian category of class struggle. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 10 June 2021 Revised 11 July 2021 Accepted 13 July 2021","PeriodicalId":43179,"journal":{"name":"International Critical Thought","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Critical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2021.2003175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Domenico Losurdo traveled to Beijing for the first time in the 1970s, when (Western) Maoism thrilled a large number of Western progressive intellectuals. But when these intellectuals turned away from China—which they accused of having consolidated an “illiberal totalitarian political regime” but also of having “restored capitalism”—by contrast Losurdo remained a friend of China. For him it was from the Chinese experience and its ability to survive the end of the USSR that one could draw inspiration to confront the most important event in the life of an entire generation: the radical crisis of Marxism and the defeat of the communist movement in the West. Western Marxism, born out of the shock of the First World War, is characterized by a utopian messianism prone to anarchism (the thesis of the extinction of the state, for example, or the claim of an immediate cancelation of borders, or hostility towards economy and technology). In China, on the other hand, Marxism has become the basis of national awareness and the consequent liberation struggle. Once political independence is reached, however, the revolution continues today in order to achieve economic independence. Hence the need for a re-elaboration of the same Marxian category of class struggle. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 10 June 2021 Revised 11 July 2021 Accepted 13 July 2021
多梅尼科·洛苏尔多在历史、政治和哲学上对“中国方式”的理解中的关键作用
20世纪70年代,Domenico Losurdo第一次来到北京,当时(西方的)毛主义让许多西方进步知识分子激动不已。但是当这些知识分子离开中国时——他们指责中国巩固了一个“不自由的极权主义政权”,同时也“恢复了资本主义”——相反,洛桑多仍然是中国的朋友。对他来说,正是从中国的经验和它在苏联解体后幸存下来的能力中,人们可以汲取灵感,去面对整整一代人生命中最重要的事件:马克思主义的激进危机和西方共产主义运动的失败。西方马克思主义诞生于第一次世界大战的冲击之中,其特点是一种乌托邦式的弥赛亚主义,倾向于无政府主义(例如,国家灭绝的论点,或立即取消边界的主张,或对经济和技术的敌意)。另一方面,在中国,马克思主义已经成为民族意识和由此产生的解放斗争的基础。然而,一旦达到政治独立,革命就会持续到今天,以实现经济独立。因此,有必要重新阐述马克思的阶级斗争范畴。文章历史2021年6月10日收稿2021年7月11日修订2021年7月13日接受
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Critical Thought
International Critical Thought POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信