The two “multis” and the multiliteracies pedagogy: “shaking hands” in the Brazilian English public education for teens

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE
Reinildes Dias, Ana Emília Turbin
{"title":"The two “multis” and the multiliteracies pedagogy: “shaking hands” in the Brazilian English public education for teens","authors":"Reinildes Dias, Ana Emília Turbin","doi":"10.5007/2175-8026.2022.e82563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English school textbooks have a long tradition in the Brazilian public sector of education. Most often they are the only pedagogical resources in an English classroom. English public textbooks are submitted to a National Program for evaluation and this educational policy has had positive impacts on these materials. This article analyzes one of the units of a textbook series for teens that was approved in 2020. Our analysis focuses on the two “multis”, the multiliteracies pedagogy and the active role today’s learners play in learning. We also highlight some alternatives for improvements and give some suggestions for English teachers. The documentary research method within the qualitative paradigm supports our analysis. Our results show that the unit follows the principles of the two “multis” and the cycle of knowledge processes although its pedagogical design can be improved. Our analysis also reviews that much has yet to be done if we consider the responsibility students have to assume when learning.","PeriodicalId":43226,"journal":{"name":"Ilha do Desterro-A Journal of English Language Literatures in English and Cultural Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ilha do Desterro-A Journal of English Language Literatures in English and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2022.e82563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

English school textbooks have a long tradition in the Brazilian public sector of education. Most often they are the only pedagogical resources in an English classroom. English public textbooks are submitted to a National Program for evaluation and this educational policy has had positive impacts on these materials. This article analyzes one of the units of a textbook series for teens that was approved in 2020. Our analysis focuses on the two “multis”, the multiliteracies pedagogy and the active role today’s learners play in learning. We also highlight some alternatives for improvements and give some suggestions for English teachers. The documentary research method within the qualitative paradigm supports our analysis. Our results show that the unit follows the principles of the two “multis” and the cycle of knowledge processes although its pedagogical design can be improved. Our analysis also reviews that much has yet to be done if we consider the responsibility students have to assume when learning.
巴西青少年英语公共教育中的两个“多元”和多元素养教学法:“握手”
英语教科书在巴西公共教育部门有着悠久的传统。大多数情况下,他们是英语课堂上唯一的教学资源。英语公共教科书提交国家项目进行评估,这一教育政策对这些教材产生了积极影响。本文分析了2020年通过的青少年系列教科书中的一个单元。我们的分析集中在两个“多元”上,即多元素养教学法和当今学习者在学习中扮演的积极角色。本文还提出了一些可供改进的地方,并对英语教师提出了一些建议。定性范式中的文献研究方法支持了我们的分析。我们的研究结果表明,该单元遵循了两个“倍数”和知识过程循环的原则,尽管它的教学设计可以改进。我们的分析还表明,如果我们考虑到学生在学习时必须承担的责任,还有很多工作要做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信